Why CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios Matter to Investors

Daniel Pedrotty is the Director of the AFL-CIO Office of Investment. This post is based on an AFL-CIO briefing paper available here.

Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires public companies to disclose the ratio of compensation between their CEO and their median employee. The Securities and Exchange Commission will propose regulations to implement this requirement later this year. In this briefing paper, the AFL-CIO Office of Investment argues why CEO-to-worker pay ratios matter to investors.

First of all, changes in CEO-to-worker pay ratios are a useful measure of growing CEO pay levels. In 1980, BusinessWeek magazine estimated that the top executives of the largest U.S. companies made 42 times the pay of factory workers. In 2010, the gap between CEO pay at S&P 500 companies and the median U.S. worker had soared to 343 times, according to the AFL-CIO’s Executive PayWatch website.

Secondly, CEO-to-worker pay ratio disclosure will help reduce CEO pay levels. Existing disclosure rules encourage setting CEO pay levels based on “peer group analysis” that has contributed to CEO pay inflation. Pay ratio disclosure will encourage Boards to also consider the relationship of CEO pay to other company employees. Companies with high pay ratios will have to explain and justify their ratio to their shareholders.

Thirdly, high CEO-to-worker pay ratios can hurt employee morale and productivity. Employees of public companies already know how much their CEO makes relative to their own pay. Academic studies have shown that large pay disparities within a company can hurt employee teamwork, loyalty, and drive. Disclosing the median pay of employees will provide valuable information about employee compensation practices.

There is no one-size-fits-all answer for the ideal ratio of CEO-to-worker compensation. Rather, disclosure of CEO-to-worker pay ratios will permit investors to compare the employee compensation structures of companies over time and to their competitors. Such disclosure will provide valuable information about which companies are investing in their human capital, an increasingly important contributor to shareholder value.

The AFL-CIO’s briefing paper Why CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios Matter For Investors is available here on the AFL-CIO’s website http://invest.aflcio.org.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

3 Comments

  1. Posted Monday, August 15, 2011 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    Your point about high ratios having an impact on team morale and drive is absolutely correct. Amazing job of pointing that out.

  2. Louis Fischetti
    Posted Friday, October 28, 2011 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    I believe disclosure of this information should be made widely available to the public at large. This will allow the consumer to decide which companies and brands to support, using the market to help curb inequality. Left unchecked and unnoticed, it’s natural for excesses to happen. Rather than the government trying to get into the compensation fairness (which is subject to the whims of politics), let society determine what is ‘too much’ and vote with their wallets.

  3. Posted Friday, January 27, 2012 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Publiishing ratios will not demonstrate how organisations are utilising their human capital. Publishing data for example on the kinds of jobs people hold and job level,would (by gender and ethnicity). There’s much research from occupational segregation showing that white men predominantly occupy upper echelons in organisations. There is similar discussionninnthe UK about ratios. There are many issues to consider as well as ratios to engender faith in investing in human capital. I am constantly surprised that no-one recognises these. Either people don’t understand, don’t want to know, or don’t care. Future leaders, our younger leaders, will hopefully have more impact, as they seem to have their eyes open more. I believe we are on the brink of a new wave of thinking needed to run organisations, and rhetoric will simply not work. Diagnosing and understanding the,complex issues and making relevant interventions, for example new leadership and role competences embedded intelligently into organisations by experts in organisational and behavioural change, will work, as much research shows. Simple changes can make a differences as for example procedural justice and psycholocal contract research shows, and many organisations in my experience, don’t do any or enough research to understand the the issues first.

5 Trackbacks

  1. […] full article and access link….via Why CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios Matter to Investors — The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Gover…. Share OptionsPrintTwitterEmailMoreFacebookLinkedInStumbleUponRedditDiggLike this:LikeBe the first […]

  2. […] Forum on Corporate Governance & Financial Regulation: Why CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios Matter to Investors – Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act contains a controversial requirement that public companies […]

  3. […] Pedrotty of the AFL-CIO analyzes “Why CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratios Matter to […]

  4. By Corporations are People: Pillow Fight Time « UP@NIGHT on Saturday, August 13, 2011 at 4:53 pm

    […] I do believe that we need a collective venting of the anger.  I propose a pillow fight.  But given the vast disparities in power and wealth, I suggest that the sides be picked in the following fashion:  Average pay of workers vs. average pay of CEO’ at the largest U.S. companies.  In 1980 one survey showed it was 42 to 1.  In 2010, 343 to 1. […]

  5. By Workers of the World Unite — with Shareholders | FavStocks on Wednesday, May 23, 2012 at 3:37 am

    […] ratio will give shareholders and workers important information. Overall, in 1980, CEO compensation averaged 42 times typical worker pay. Workers at that time received a larger share of the benefits from the […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  • Subscribe

  • Cosponsored By:

  • Supported By:

  • Programs Faculty & Senior Fellows

    Lucian Bebchuk
    Alon Brav
    Robert Charles Clark
    John Coates
    Alma Cohen
    Stephen M. Davis
    Allen Ferrell
    Jesse Fried
    Oliver Hart
    Ben W. Heineman, Jr.
    Scott Hirst
    Howell Jackson
    Robert J. Jackson, Jr.
    Wei Jiang
    Reinier Kraakman
    Robert Pozen
    Mark Ramseyer
    Mark Roe
    Robert Sitkoff
    Holger Spamann
    Guhan Subramanian

  • Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board

    William Ackman
    Peter Atkins
    Joseph Bachelder
    John Bader
    Allison Bennington
    Richard Breeden
    Daniel Burch
    Richard Climan
    Jesse Cohn
    Isaac Corré
    Scott Davis
    John Finley
    Daniel Fischel
    Stephen Fraidin
    Byron Georgiou
    Larry Hamdan
    Carl Icahn
    David Millstone
    Theodore Mirvis
    James Morphy
    Toby Myerson
    Barry Rosenstein
    Paul Rowe
    Rodman Ward