Lucian Bebchuk and Martin Lipton to Debate Blockholder Regulation

Next Tuesday, November 13, the Conference Board will host a debate in New York City between Lucian Bebchuk, a professor of Law, Economics and Finance at Harvard Law School, and Martin Lipton, a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rozen & Katz (WLRK) on the regulation of outside blockholders. Those interested in attending the debate can do so by RSVP’ing at the Conference Board website here by Wednesday, November 7.

This debate will be the fourth time over the past decade that Bebchuk and Lipton will engage in an exchange:

The 2012 debate concerns an issue that became prominent last year when WLRK submitted a rulemaking petition (available here) to the SEC, advocating a tightening of the rules governing disclosure by outside blockholders under the Williams Act. In particular, the WLRK petition advocates reducing the period of time before the owner of 5% or more of a public company’s stock must disclose that position, from ten days to one day.

Lucian Bebchuk and Robert Jackson then issued a paper, titled The Law and Economics of Blockholder Disclosure, which takes issue with the positions advanced by the WLRK petition. The Bebchuk & Jackson article seeks to provide a framework for the SEC to examine the rules governing outside blockholders. Until the SEC undertakes such an examination, Bebchuk & Jackson argue, existing research and empirical evidence provide no basis for concluding that WLRK’s proposed tightening would protect investors or promote efficiency. Rather, such research and empirical evidence raises concerns that WLRK’s proposed tightening would harm investors and reduce efficiency. Bebchuk & Jackson’s article is available here; PowerPoint slides describing the paper’s main points are available here; and a post by the authors discussing the paper is available here.

Four senior attorneys in the corporate and litigation departments at WLRK — Adam O. Emmerich, Theodore Mirvis, Eric S. Robinson, and William Savitt — have subsequently put forward a detailed critique of Bebchuk & Jackson’s analysis. Their paper, titled Fair Markets and Fair Disclosure: Some Thoughts on The Law and Economics of Blockholder Disclosure, and the Use and Abuse of Shareholder Power, is available here, and a post by the authors summarizing the paper is available here.

The next round will take place in New York City next week.

Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Subscribe

  • Cosponsored By:

  • Supported By:

  • Programs Faculty & Senior Fellows

    Lucian Bebchuk
    Alon Brav
    Robert Charles Clark
    John Coates
    Alma Cohen
    Stephen M. Davis
    Allen Ferrell
    Jesse Fried
    Oliver Hart
    Ben W. Heineman, Jr.
    Scott Hirst
    Howell Jackson
    Wei Jiang
    Reinier Kraakman
    Robert Pozen
    Mark Ramseyer
    Mark Roe
    Robert Sitkoff
    Holger Spamann
    Guhan Subramanian

  • Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board

    William Ackman
    Peter Atkins
    Joseph Bachelder
    John Bader
    Allison Bennington
    Richard Breeden
    Daniel Burch
    Richard Climan
    Jesse Cohn
    Isaac Corré
    Scott Davis
    John Finley
    Daniel Fischel
    Stephen Fraidin
    Byron Georgiou
    Larry Hamdan
    Carl Icahn
    David Millstone
    Theodore Mirvis
    James Morphy
    Toby Myerson
    Barry Rosenstein
    Paul Rowe
    Rodman Ward