How to Use Social Media for Regulation FD Compliance

Richard J. Sandler is a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and co-head of the firm’s global corporate governance group. This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum.

Regulation FD, adopted by the SEC in 2000, prohibits “selective disclosure” by requiring public companies to disclose material information through broadly accessible channels. Thirteen years ago, this meant EDGAR filings, press releases and quarterly earnings calls.

The SEC recently issued a report of investigation under Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regarding its inquiry into a post by Netflix’s CEO on his personal Facebook page. In the report, the SEC affirmed that a company may use social media to communicate with investors without violating Regulation FD – as long as the company had adequately informed the market that material information would be disclosed in this manner. The report states that whether a company’s social media disclosure satisfies Regulation FD will depend upon the principles outlined in the SEC’s 2008 guidance, Commission Guidance on the Use of Company Web Sites, while recapping that guidance in a way that should make these principles more workable for companies that want to use websites, social media and other evolving communication methods to disclose important information to the market.

With the benefit of this Section 21(a) report, companies should be comfortable using evolving communication methods for corporate disclosure. Companies should continue to thoughtfully plan how to ensure that these methods alone can satisfy Regulation FD, and should remain alert to other possible federal securities law concerns that can arise when they or their executives use these methods to deliver corporate news. Below we offer a few insights into the report as well as some strategies to follow when making Regulation FD-sensitive corporate disclosures via non-traditional channels.


The Section 21(a) report grew out of the SEC’s inquiry into a post made last year by Netflix’s CEO on his personal Facebook page announcing a milestone in the company’s monthly usage numbers. Before the Facebook post, the CEO had publicly stated that the company did not use social media (Facebook or otherwise) to communicate material information to investors. Ultimately, the SEC declined to bring an enforcement action despite some suggestion that it did not consider this particular use of a Facebook post to comply with Regulation FD. The report does not explain why the SEC decided to avoid an enforcement action and instead proceed with a Section 21(a) report (a tool it uses sparingly).

Using Social Media to Satisfy Regulation FD

Even though corporate use of social media has skyrocketed in recent years, before the Section 21(a) report the SEC was officially silent on the use of social media to comply with Regulation FD. The report addresses this gap in guidance and makes it clear that the SEC does not “wish to inhibit the content, form, or forum” of corporate disclosures, but rather seeks to “encourage companies to seek out new forms of communication to better connect with shareholders.” Confirming the views of many practitioners, the report states that the principles outlined in the 2008 guidance, which discusses when information posted on a company website may be considered “public” for purposes of Regulation FD, also apply to disclosure made via social media and other “rapidly changing forms of communication.”

We think the Netflix Section 21(a) report is a noteworthy improvement on the 2008 guidance for two key reasons.

First, the report stresses that the key factor in determining whether social media disclosure satisfies Regulation FD is whether the company has adequately informed investors, the market and the media that it will communicate material information in this manner. This emphasis on sufficient advance notice should turn out to be quite helpful. The 2008 guidance was sometimes observed to have created a “chicken and egg” problem by focusing on whether a company’s website was already a “recognized channel of distribution” at the time the information in question was posted. Without a track record of using only its website to release material information, a company would have a hard time knowing whether its website met this standard. As a result, many companies adopted a belt-and-suspenders approach to Regulation FD compliance, in which a press release or Form 8-K is used to disclose information that is also disclosed via the company website, or an “advisory press release” is used to alert investors that material information will be posted at a certain time. If a company regularly releases all material information through a press release or Form 8-K, however, the concern persists that investors may not bother subscribing to RSS feeds, for example, because more traditional methods of disclosure remain in use – further inhibiting the development of the website as a recognized channel. By focusing on notice, rather than on whether a company’s disclosure channels have become “recognized” in the eyes of third parties, the Section 21(a) report provides a concrete step a company can take to establish a particular channel as a Regulation FD compliance tool.

Second, the report indicates that, as long as proper notice is given, the use of a subscription-based medium such as Facebook or Twitter can be suitable for Regulation FD purposes. This clears up a lingering concern that requiring an investor to subscribe, register or otherwise “opt in” to receive disclosures, even where no payment is required, might violate the Regulation FD imperative that disclosure be made on a “non-exclusionary” basis.

Going Forward

Below are a few suggestions that companies can adopt to lay the groundwork for website and social media disclosure of Regulation FD-sensitive corporate information.

  • Decide which channels you want to use – and be specific. We believe it makes sense to identify the precise location where material information will appear, such as the specific URL, Twitter handle or Facebook page, rather than a general home page or a general reference to a particular social media site. For some information, such as an upcoming earnings release, you may also be able to indicate to investors in advance when you expect to provide the information. The more specificity you provide investors about where and when to find future announcements the better. The SEC will expect you to make it easy for investors to find information. And although the SEC is comfortable with “opt in” channels, an investor should not have to pay money or agree to unusual license terms in order to access the channel.
  • Decide what type of information you want to disclose. Although many companies will use websites and social media for some form of content, we expect that practice will continue to vary as to what types of information will be communicated through these channels. If a company decides, for example, that it will communicate key financial metrics through these channels, it would make sense to highlight that.
  • Craft a short paragraph explaining what you plan to disclose and where you plan to disclose it. Once you have decided what channels you will use and what you will communicate through these channels, you need a concise statement explaining this.
  • Publish this paragraph regularly in your annual and quarterly reports, in your press release boilerplate, and on the home page of your corporate website. This is the key to ensuring that the market has notice of your plans. If you intend to change your practices, make sure notice of the change is publicized well in advance.
  • Use available push technology. When possible, you should provide a mechanism for investors to receive alerts that new information has been posted. This can be accomplished by giving investors the ability to subscribe to RSS or other social media feeds, and informing investors that these feeds are available and how to subscribe. Investors should have adequate time to subscribe before you begin to use the related disclosure channel.
  • Use it or lose it. Once you have announced your intention to use a particular channel for a particular purpose, it’s important that you use it as you have described. Sporadic or inconsistent use is less likely to produce the kind of market following that the SEC is clearly looking for.
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Trackback

  1. By Weekly Top Story Digest - April 17, 2013 | @ComplexD on Wednesday, April 17, 2013 at 7:34 am

    […] to Use Social Media for Regulation FD Compliance – (Richard […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  • Subscribe

  • Cosponsored By:

  • Supported By:

  • Programs Faculty & Senior Fellows

    Lucian Bebchuk
    Alon Brav
    Robert Charles Clark
    John Coates
    Alma Cohen
    Stephen M. Davis
    Allen Ferrell
    Jesse Fried
    Oliver Hart
    Ben W. Heineman, Jr.
    Scott Hirst
    Howell Jackson
    Robert J. Jackson, Jr.
    Wei Jiang
    Reinier Kraakman
    Robert Pozen
    Mark Ramseyer
    Mark Roe
    Robert Sitkoff
    Holger Spamann
    Guhan Subramanian

  • Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board

    William Ackman
    Peter Atkins
    Joseph Bachelder
    John Bader
    Allison Bennington
    Daniel Burch
    Richard Climan
    Jesse Cohn
    Isaac Corré
    Scott Davis
    John Finley
    David Fox
    Stephen Fraidin
    Byron Georgiou
    Larry Hamdan
    Carl Icahn
    Jack B. Jacobs
    Paula Loop
    David Millstone
    Theodore Mirvis
    James Morphy
    Toby Myerson
    Morton Pierce
    Barry Rosenstein
    Paul Rowe
    Rodman Ward