<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/01/30/the-state-of-corporate-governance-for-2015/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 11:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The State of Corporate Governance for 2015</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/01/30/the-state-of-corporate-governance-for-2015/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-state-of-corporate-governance-for-2015</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/01/30/the-state-of-corporate-governance-for-2015/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter & bylaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=68056?d=20150303153750EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="background: #F8F8F8;padding: 10px;margin-top: 5px;margin-bottom: 10px"><strong>Editor's Note:</strong> <a href="http://www.sidley.com/holly-j-gregory/" target="_blank">Holly J. Gregory</a> is a partner and co-global coordinator of the Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation group at Sidley Austin LLP. The following post is based on a Sidley update.</div>

<p>The balance of power between shareholders and boards of directors is central to the U.S. public corporation’s success as an engine of economic growth, job creation and innovation. Yet that balance is under significant and increasing strain. In 2015, we expect to see continued growth in shareholder activism and engagement, as well as in the influence of shareholder initiatives, including advisory proposals and votes. Time will tell whether, over the long term, tipping the balance to greater shareholder influence will prove beneficial for corporations, their shareholders and our economy at large. In the near term, there is reason to question whether increased shareholder influence on matters that the law has traditionally apportioned to the board is at the expense of other values that are key to the sustainability of healthy corporations. These concerns underlie the issues that will define the state of governance in 2015 and likely beyond:</p>

<p><a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2015/01/30/the-state-of-corporate-governance-for-2015/#more-68056" target="_blank">Click here to read the complete post...</a></p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Holly J. Gregory, Sidley Austin LLP, on Friday, January 30, 2015 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.sidley.com/holly-j-gregory/" target="_blank">Holly J. Gregory</a> is a partner and co-global coordinator of the Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation group at Sidley Austin LLP. The following post is based on a Sidley update.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The balance of power between shareholders and boards of directors is central to the U.S. public corporation’s success as an engine of economic growth, job creation and innovation. Yet that balance is under significant and increasing strain. In 2015, we expect to see continued growth in shareholder activism and engagement, as well as in the influence of shareholder initiatives, including advisory proposals and votes. Time will tell whether, over the long term, tipping the balance to greater shareholder influence will prove beneficial for corporations, their shareholders and our economy at large. In the near term, there is reason to question whether increased shareholder influence on matters that the law has traditionally apportioned to the board is at the expense of other values that are key to the sustainability of healthy corporations. These concerns underlie the issues that will define the state of governance in 2015 and likely beyond:</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/01/30/the-state-of-corporate-governance-for-2015/#more-70489" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The State of Corporate Governance for 2015">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/01/30/the-state-of-corporate-governance-for-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
