<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2006/12/07/sec-tables-consideration-of-proxy-access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC Tables Consideration of Proxy Access</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2006/12/07/sec-tables-consideration-of-proxy-access/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sec-tables-consideration-of-proxy-access</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2006/12/07/sec-tables-consideration-of-proxy-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Program News & Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFSCME v. AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 14a-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2006/12/08/sec-tables-consideration-of-proxy-acc?d=20061207103112EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the evening of December 6, the Securities and Exchange Commission published its agenda for the open meeting scheduled for December 13, 2006. This past September, in AFSCME v. AIG, the Second Circuit held that shareholders had the right to introduce proposals to adopt proxy access regimes at their corporations. Following the decision, the SEC [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left">During the evening of December 6, the <a href="http://www.sec.gov">Securities and Exchange Commission</a> published its <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/openmeetings/2006/ssamtg121306.htm">agenda</a> for the open meeting scheduled for December 13, 2006. This past September, in <a href="http://www.directorship.com/pdf/AFSCMEvAIG.pdf">AFSCME v. AIG</a>, the <a href="http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov">Second Circuit</a> held that shareholders had the right to introduce proposals to adopt proxy access regimes at their corporations.</p>
<p>Following the decision, the SEC immediately <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2006/2006-150.htm">announced</a> that it would consider amending <a href="http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/34ActRls/rule14a-8.html">Rule 14a-8</a> to address the Second Circuit&#8217;s decision. In October, however, the SEC <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/openmeetings/2006/agenda101806.htm">deferred</a> consideration of any proposed amendment to Rule 14a-8 until the open meeting scheduled for December 13. From the agenda published for next week&#8217;s meeting, it is apparent that the Commission has again decided to delay its consideration of this subject.</p>
<p>Individuals affiliated with the Program have over the past several years actively participated in the debate over proxy access. This involvement includes:</p>
<p>-An <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk/Policy/AmicusCuria_Brief.pdf"><em>amicus curiae</em> brief</a> in the AFSCME v. AIG case itself, filed by <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk">Lucian Bebchuk</a>, <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/fferrell/">Allen Ferrell</a>, <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/facdir.php?id=37">Reinier Kraakman</a>, <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/facdir.php?id=127">Mark Roe</a>, and <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/facdir.php?id=445">Guhan Subramanian</a>, in support of shareholders&#8217; right to introduce proxy-access proposals;</p>
<p>-A <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk/Policy/48LawProfs_SEC.pdf">letter on this subject</a> sent to the SEC by several members of the faculty and other law professors;</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2006/12/07/sec-tables-consideration-of-proxy-access/#more-64160" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Tables Consideration of Proxy Access">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2006/12/07/sec-tables-consideration-of-proxy-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
