<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2007/10/12/the-sec-gatekeeper-of-shareholder-state-law-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 11:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The SEC: Gatekeeper of Shareholder Rights?</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2007/10/12/the-sec-gatekeeper-of-shareholder-state-law-rights/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-sec-gatekeeper-of-shareholder-state-law-rights</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2007/10/12/the-sec-gatekeeper-of-shareholder-state-law-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 20:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Eds & Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/10/12/the-sec-gatekeeper-of-shareholder-sta?d=20071012162129EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: The following post is from J. Robert Brown, Jr., University of Denver Sturm College of Law, and Sandeep Gopalan, Arizona State University Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor College of Law. Lynn Stout discussed her Wall Street Journal op-ed on the SEC&#8217;s upcoming vote in a post available here. Lucian Bebchuk recently posted here on a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> The following post is from J. Robert Brown, Jr., University of Denver Sturm College of Law, and Sandeep Gopalan, Arizona State University Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor College of Law. <a href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/home/index.asp?page=722">Lynn Stout</a> discussed her <a href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/docs/stoutoped.pdf"><em>Wall Street Journal </em>op-ed</a> on the SEC&#8217;s upcoming vote in a post available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/10/07/corporations-shouldnt-be-democracies/">here</a>. <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bebchuk/">Lucian Bebchuk</a> recently posted <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2007/10/05/comment-letter-of-thirty-nine-law-professors-in-favor-of-placing-shareholder-proposed-bylaw-amendments-on-the-corporate-ballot/">here</a> on a <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/law-professors-comment-letter.pdf">comment letter</a> on these proposals submitted to the SEC by thirty-nine law professors.</div>
<p>Professor <a href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/home/index.asp?page=722">Lynn Stout</a> recently published an op-ed in the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> entitled <em><a href="http://www.law.ucla.edu/docs/stoutoped.pdf">Corporations Shouldn’t Be Democracies</a></em>. The piece opposes shareholder access to the proxy for the adoption of election-related bylaws and urges the Commission to adopt a <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2007/spch072507cc.htm">proposed rule that would eliminate such access</a>. (One of us has explained our opposition to the no-access proposal in a <a href="http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-17-07/s71707-16.pdf">comment letter</a> submitted by the <em><a href="http://www.theracetothebottom.org/">Race to the Bottom Blog</a></em>.) The absence of concrete data in the piece exemplifies the difficulty opponents have had in developing credible positions against shareholder access.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2007/10/12/the-sec-gatekeeper-of-shareholder-state-law-rights/#more-261" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The SEC: Gatekeeper of Shareholder Rights?">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2007/10/12/the-sec-gatekeeper-of-shareholder-state-law-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
