<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/07/02/delaware-supreme-court-to-rule-on-the-validity-of-shareholder-adopted-bylaws/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Supreme Court to Rule on the Validity of Shareholder-Adopted Bylaws</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/07/02/delaware-supreme-court-to-rule-on-the-validity-of-shareholder-adopted-bylaws/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-supreme-court-to-rule-on-the-validity-of-shareholder-adopted-bylaws</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/07/02/delaware-supreme-court-to-rule-on-the-validity-of-shareholder-adopted-bylaws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA v. AFSCME]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter & bylaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 14a-8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2008/07/02/delaware-supreme-court-to-rule-on-the-validity-of-shareholder-adopted-bylaws/?d=20150122113324EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission has certified to the Delaware Supreme Court two questions of law regarding the permissibility of a bylaw amendment submitted as a shareholder proposal to a Delaware corporation, CA, Inc. The amendment would require the company to reimburse reasonable stockholder expenses incurred in running a short slate of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Andrew Tuch, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Wednesday, July 2, 2008 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">This post is part of the <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission has certified to the Delaware Supreme Court two questions of law regarding the permissibility of a bylaw amendment submitted as a shareholder proposal to a Delaware corporation, CA, Inc. The amendment would require the company to reimburse reasonable stockholder expenses incurred in running a short slate of director nominees for election. This is the first time that the SEC has used this certification procedure.</p>
<p>CA asserts that the shareholder proposal may be excluded from its 2008 proxy materials under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 on the grounds that the proposal is an improper subject for shareholder action under Delaware law and that the proposal, if adopted, would cause CA to violate Delaware law. The Court has agreed to an immediate determination of the questions certified and ordered briefs to be filed on or before Monday, July 7. Oral argument is to be held on Wednesday, July 9.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s order accepting the questions certified by the SEC is available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/corrected-order.pdf" target="_new">here</a>. The SEC&#8217;s certification of questions of law, with the SEC General Counsel&#8217;s covering letter, are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ca-sec-certification.pdf" target="_new">here</a> and <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ca-sec-general-counsel-letter.pdf" target="_new">here</a>. The competing legal opinions are available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ca-grant-and-eisenhofer-letter.pdf" target="_new">here</a> and <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ca-counsels-opinion.pdf" target="_new">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/07/02/delaware-supreme-court-to-rule-on-the-validity-of-shareholder-adopted-bylaws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
