<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/10/25/the-trust-has-left-the-building-23000-on-spa-treatments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Trust Has Left the Building: $23,000 on Spa Treatments</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/10/25/the-trust-has-left-the-building-23000-on-spa-treatments/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-trust-has-left-the-building-23000-on-spa-treatments</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/10/25/the-trust-has-left-the-building-23000-on-spa-treatments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=704?d=20150122112147EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like the folks at AIG have taken &#8220;tone at the top&#8221; to heart. Unfortunately, their tone isn&#8217;t of the type that is good news for taxpayers, who now own 80% of AIG. As this Washington Post article describes, two former AIG CEOs were grilled during a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Broc Romanek, TheCorporateCounsel.net, on Saturday, October 25, 2008 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">This post is from Broc Romanek of TheCorporateCounsel.net.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>It looks like the folks at AIG have taken &#8220;tone at the top&#8221; to heart. Unfortunately, their tone isn&#8217;t of the type that is good news for taxpayers, who now own 80% of AIG. As this Washington Post <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/07/AR2008100702604.html">article</a> describes, two former AIG CEOs were grilled during a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing this week (one of whom received a $5 million performance bonus just before he left &#8211; in addition to a $15 million golden parachute &#8211; and another AIG executive was fired still receives $1 million <em>per month</em> for consulting services). The former CEOs expressed no remorse for their actions that drove AIG into the arms of the government and didn&#8217;t acknowledge making any mistakes. Rather, they blamed the accounting. The House committee members were visibly disturbed by the sheer audacity of these so-called corporate leaders. Given the long list of troubling practices at AIG described in this front-page WSJ <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122348485787515823.html?mod=todays_us_page_one">article</a>, we may well see these two in pinstripes someday.</p>
<p>The topper is the fact that AIG is now getting an additional $37.8 billion loan from the taxpayers, which is lumped on top of the $80 billion load the government provided last month. This came a day after it was revealed that the company held a junket for sales reps at a resort, spending unbelievable amounts of the taxpayer&#8217;s money. How exactly does one spend $23,000 on spa treatments or $5,000 at the bar? The story is outrageous and listening to the radio, it&#8217;s fair to say that AIG already has become the posterchild of all that is broken in Corporate America. If this doesn&#8217;t get you mad, nothing will.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/10/25/the-trust-has-left-the-building-23000-on-spa-treatments/#more-704" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Trust Has Left the Building: $23,000 on Spa Treatments">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2008/10/25/the-trust-has-left-the-building-23000-on-spa-treatments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
