<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/18/a-mid-year-review-of-sec-enforcement-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>A Mid-Year Review of SEC Enforcement in 2009</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/18/a-mid-year-review-of-sec-enforcement-in-2009/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-mid-year-review-of-sec-enforcement-in-2009</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/18/a-mid-year-review-of-sec-enforcement-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 14:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backdating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial advisers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=2606?d=20090718103126EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: This post is by Eduardo Gallardo&#8217;s colleagues Mark Schonfeld, John Sturc, Barry Goldsmith, Eric Creizman, Jennifer Colgan Halter, Akita St. Clair, Ladan Stewart and Matthew Estabrook. Without question, the first six months of 2009 have been a period of sharply increased enforcement activity at the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial crisis, the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> This post is by Eduardo Gallardo&#8217;s colleagues <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/mschonfeld" target="_new">Mark Schonfeld</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jsturc" target="_new">John Sturc</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/bgoldsmith" target="_new">Barry Goldsmith</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/ecreizman" target="_new">Eric Creizman</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jhalter" target="_new">Jennifer Colgan Halter</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/astclair" target="_new">Akita St. Clair</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/lstewart" target="_new">Ladan Stewart</a> and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/mestabrook" target="_new">Matthew Estabrook</a>.</div>
<p>Without question, the first six months of 2009 have been a period of sharply increased enforcement activity at the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The financial crisis, the new administration, new SEC leadership, increased funding and the focus of Congress and the media have all combined to encourage heightened government scrutiny.  And even though it has only been a few months since a new Chairman took office, already there are tangible signs that  the SEC has taken a more aggressive enforcement posture.  In this alert, we review the changes the new SEC leadership has instituted and is considering, the observable impact of the new administration on enforcement activity and significant cases in key areas that reflect the agency&#8217;s evolving enforcement program.</p>
<p><strong>I.  Overview of Changes</p>
<p>A.  The Backdrop</strong></p>
<p>The events of 2008 led directly to the current enforcement agenda.  The collapse of the subprime mortgage market, the ensuing credit crisis, the demise of several major investment banks and, perhaps most of all, the Madoff case led to a loss of confidence in the agency&#8217;s ability to protect investors.  This loss of confidence was manifested in  Congressional hearings and an intensified media spotlight.  At the same time, the SEC&#8217;s Inspector General has issued a number of reports critical of the agency, and Congress intensified pressure on the SEC and Department of Justice to bring cases in the wake of the financial crisis.  At a March hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee on the law enforcement response to the financial crisis, Senator Patrick J. Leahy declared, &#8220;I want to see prosecutions….  I want to see people go to jail.&#8221; </p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/18/a-mid-year-review-of-sec-enforcement-in-2009/#more-2606" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading A Mid-Year Review of SEC Enforcement in 2009">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/18/a-mid-year-review-of-sec-enforcement-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
