<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/19/responding-to-the-sec-proxy-access-rule-proposal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 11:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Responding to the SEC Proxy Access Rule Proposal</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/19/responding-to-the-sec-proxy-access-rule-proposal/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=responding-to-the-sec-proxy-access-rule-proposal</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/19/responding-to-the-sec-proxy-access-rule-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgeson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=2677?d=20150122104042EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that the SEC has issued its proposed proxy access rules and asked for comments by August 17, a critical issue for public companies is what do to in response to this SEC initiative and when. In this Proxy Access Analysis, we provide suggestions for how general counsel and corporate secretaries may begin to educate [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Charles M. Nathan, Latham & Watkins LLP, on Sunday, July 19, 2009 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">This post comes to us from <a href="http://www.lw.com/Attorneys.aspx?page=AttorneyBio&amp;attno=00150" target="_new">Charles Nathan</a> of <a href="http://www.lw.com/" target="_new">Latham &amp; Watkins LLP</a> and <a href="http://www.georgesonshareholder.com/usa/bios/rhondabrauer.php" target="_new">Rhonda Brauer</a> of <a href="http://www.georgesonshareholder.com/" target="_new">Georgeson Inc.</a></p>
</div></hgroup><p>Now that the SEC has issued its proposed proxy access rules and asked for comments by August 17, a critical issue for public companies is what do to in response to this SEC initiative and when. In this Proxy Access Analysis, we provide suggestions for how general counsel and corporate secretaries may begin to educate their management and boards on the issues presented by the proposed rules, evaluate the alternatives for commenting on the proposed rules and plan a course of action for their companies if proxy access is adopted for the 2010 proxy season.</p>
<p>There is a limited amount of time for dealing with proxy access, given the August 17 deadline for SEC comments and the SEC’s apparent intent to promulgate final proxy access rules by the end of November so that they can be effective for the 2010 proxy season. As a result, general counsel and corporate secretaries should be reviewing their board and governance committee meeting schedules now to be sure that there is ample time to educate their management and boards and to take any actions deemed appropriate by their boards, with sufficient flexibility to accommodate the SEC’s proxy access rule-making calendar as it develops.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/19/responding-to-the-sec-proxy-access-rule-proposal/#more-2677" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Responding to the SEC Proxy Access Rule Proposal">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/07/19/responding-to-the-sec-proxy-access-rule-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
