<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/11/12/fiduciary-outs-the-intricacies-of-a-concept-run-amok/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 16:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Fiduciary Outs:  The Intricacies Of A Concept Run Amok</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/11/12/fiduciary-outs-the-intricacies-of-a-concept-run-amok/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fiduciary-outs-the-intricacies-of-a-concept-run-amok</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/11/12/fiduciary-outs-the-intricacies-of-a-concept-run-amok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Program News & Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deal protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary outs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=5274?d=20160907095500EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: This post is part of the Delaware law series, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available here. Recently, in the Mergers and Acquisitions course at Harvard Law School, four preeminent M&#38;A practitioners discussed deal protection and fiduciary outs in merger transactions [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background: #F8F8F8; padding: 10px; margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px;"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> This post is part of the <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</div>
<p>Recently, in the Mergers and Acquisitions course at Harvard Law School, four preeminent M&amp;A practitioners discussed deal protection and fiduciary outs in merger transactions with Vice Chancellor Leo Strine, Jr., who teaches the class.  The panelists were <a href="http://www.cravath.com/bios/pgelston.aspx" target="_blank">Philip Gelston</a>, a corporate transactional partner at <a href="http://www.cravath.com/Cravath.html" target="_blank">Cravath, Swaine &amp; Moore LLP</a>; <a href="http://www.gelaw.com/attorneys/grant.html" target="_blank">Stuart Grant</a>, co-founder of <a href="http://www.gelaw.com/" target="_blank">Grant &amp; Eisenhofer P.A.</a>; <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Rowe,%20Paul%20K." target="_blank">Paul Rowe</a>, a litigation partner at <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/" target="_blank">Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz</a>; and <a href="http://www.sullcrom.com/cohenaudrad/" target="_blank">Audra Cohen</a>, a mergers and acquisitions partner at <a href="http://www.sullcrom.com/" target="_blank">Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP</a>.</p>
<p>The panel discussed Delaware&#8217;s significant deal protection decisions, including Smith v. Van Gorkom, Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc., Paramount Communications, Inc. v. QVC Network Inc., Quickturn Design Sys., Inc. v. Shapiro, ACE Ltd. v. Capital Re Corp. (in which the Vice Chancellor wrote the decision of the Chancery Court level) and Omnicare Inc. v. NCS Healthcare, Inc.  There was then discussion of the advisory opinion in CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Employees Pension Plan and its implications.</p>
<p><del>The video of the panel is available here (Quicktime .mov file).</del> (video no longer available)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2009/11/12/fiduciary-outs-the-intricacies-of-a-concept-run-amok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
