<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/01/30/street-name-registration-an-antiquated-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 11:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Street Name Registration: An Antiquated Idea</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/01/30/street-name-registration-an-antiquated-idea/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=street-name-registration-an-antiquated-idea</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/01/30/street-name-registration-an-antiquated-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CorpGov.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct registration system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street name registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Proxy Exchange]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=6818?d=20150120104314EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Street name registration” largely took root under emergency conditions stemming from a paperwork crisis during the 1960s, before networked computers were ubiquitous in trading markets. Immobilizing stock and registering it in the name Cede &#38;Co., which was presumed by many to a temporary measure, now undermines our ownership culture. Just as poker chips allow us [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Scott Hirst, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Saturday, January 30, 2010 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">This post comes to us from James McRitchie, Editor of <a href="http://corpgov.net/wordpress/" target="_blank">CorpGov.net</a> and Glyn Holton, Executive Director, <a href="http://us.proxyexchange.org/" target="_blank">United States Proxy Exchange</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>“Street name registration” largely took root under emergency conditions stemming from a paperwork crisis during the 1960s, before networked computers were ubiquitous in trading markets. Immobilizing stock and registering it in the name Cede &amp;Co., which was presumed by many to a temporary measure, now undermines our ownership culture.</p>
<p>Just as poker chips allow us to play under rules that often favor the house, those holding “security entitlements,” instead of registered stock, do not acquire the rights of real shareowners.</p>
<p>Street name registration, and the costs associated with shareowners learning each other’s identity, escalates the cost of proxy solicitations to hundreds of thousands of dollars—and that exorbitant cost is why entrenched boards routinely run unopposed. Eliminating street name registration, in favor of a direct registration system (DRS), could bring the cost of proxy solicitation down to a few thousand dollars. That could have a bigger impact on shareowner rights than the SEC’s proposed proxy access initiative.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/01/30/street-name-registration-an-antiquated-idea/#more-6818" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Street Name Registration: An Antiquated Idea">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/01/30/street-name-registration-an-antiquated-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
