<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/06/24/sarbanes-oxley-clawback-developments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 11:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sarbanes-Oxley &#8221;Clawback&#8221; Developments</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/06/24/sarbanes-oxley-clawback-developments/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sarbanes-oxley-clawback-developments</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/06/24/sarbanes-oxley-clawback-developments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clawbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC v. Jenkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=10438?d=20150120101757EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SEC recently achieved a significant victory in its campaign to use the “clawback” provision under Sarbanes-Oxley to force the return of incentive-based compensation by CEOs and CFOs to issuers, even when they are not personally responsible for any alleged “misconduct.” SEC v. Jenkins, No. CV 09-1510-PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. June 9, 2010). The court in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by John F. Savarese, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, June 24, 2010 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Savarese,%20John%20F." target="_blank">John Savarese</a> is a partner in the Litigation Department of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton firm memorandum by Mr. Savarese and <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Carlin,%20Wayne%20M." target="_blank">Wayne M. Carlin</a>, and relates to the decision in the recent case of <em>SEC v. Jenkins</em>, which is available <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/docs/SECvJenkinsDec.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The SEC recently achieved a significant victory in its campaign to use the “clawback” provision under Sarbanes-Oxley to force the return of incentive-based compensation by CEOs and CFOs to issuers, even when they are not personally responsible for any alleged “misconduct.” <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/docs/SECvJenkinsDec.pdf" target="_blank"><em>SEC v. Jenkins</em>, No. CV 09-1510-PHX-GMS (D. Ariz. June 9, 2010)</a>. The court in <em>Jenkins</em> denied a motion to dismiss the SEC’s complaint seeking an order directing Maynard L. Jenkins, the former CEO of CSK Auto Corporation, to pay back to CSK over $4 million in bonuses and stock sale proceeds that Jenkins received during a period for which CSK’s financial statements were later restated. The case is noteworthy because the SEC has pointedly not charged Jenkins with any wrongdoing, notwithstanding that other former CSK executives have faced both civil and criminal accounting fraud charges. (See our memo, <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/webdocs/wlrknew/WLRKMemos/WLRK/WLRK.16845.09.pdf" target="_blank">SEC Pursues Unprecedented Sarbanes-Oxley “Clawback,” July 24, 2009.</a>)</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/06/24/sarbanes-oxley-clawback-developments/#more-10438" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Sarbanes-Oxley &#8221;Clawback&#8221; Developments">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/06/24/sarbanes-oxley-clawback-developments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
