<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/05/action-by-written-consent-a-new-focus-for-shareholder-activism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 13:53:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Action by Written Consent: A New Focus for Shareholder Activism</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/05/action-by-written-consent-a-new-focus-for-shareholder-activism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=action-by-written-consent-a-new-focus-for-shareholder-activism</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/05/action-by-written-consent-a-new-focus-for-shareholder-activism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 14:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antitakeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Written consent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=10666?d=20150120101621EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals advocating that corporations provide shareholders with the right to act by written consent in lieu of a meeting reappeared on ballots this proxy season after a hiatus of several years and have won average shareholder support of over 54%. While these proposals are nonbinding and the number of companies with such proposals on [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Scott Hirst, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Monday, July 5, 2010 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">This post comes to us from <a href="http://www.cgsh.com/ru/eklingsberg/" target="_blank">Ethan Klingsberg</a>, a partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton LLP focusing on mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buy-outs and corporate and SEC matters, and is based on a Cleary Gottlieb Steen &amp; Hamilton client memorandum by Mr. Klingsberg, <a href="http://www.cgsh.com/lalpert/" target="_blank">Laurent Alpert</a>, <a href="http://www.cgsh.com/jfisher/" target="_blank">Janet Fisher</a>, <a href="http://www.cgsh.com/vlewkow/" target="_blank">Victor Lewkow</a> and <strong>Lillian Raben</strong>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Shareholder proposals advocating that corporations provide shareholders with the right to act by written consent in lieu of a meeting reappeared on ballots this proxy season after a hiatus of several years and have won average shareholder support of over 54%. While these proposals are nonbinding and the number of companies with such proposals on the ballot in 2010 is relatively small – a total of 16 companies, according to RiskMetrics – the level of shareholder support is striking and will likely encourage proponents to advance proposals at more companies next year.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/05/action-by-written-consent-a-new-focus-for-shareholder-activism/#more-10666" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Action by Written Consent: A New Focus for Shareholder Activism">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/05/action-by-written-consent-a-new-focus-for-shareholder-activism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
