<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/29/erosion-of-the-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-insider-trading-actions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Erosion of the Fiduciary Duty Requirement in Insider Trading Actions</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/29/erosion-of-the-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-insider-trading-actions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=erosion-of-the-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-insider-trading-actions</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/29/erosion-of-the-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-insider-trading-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC v. Cuban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC v. Dorozhko]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=11474?d=20150120100937EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every decade or so, a new wave of interest in prosecuting insider trading emerges. We see this now. Just as the tides of interest in insider trading ebb and flow, so too do the contours of the offense itself. Given the present environment, of course, one would expect regulators to step up insider-trading enforcement, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Joel M. Cohen, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Thursday, July 29, 2010 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jcohen" target="_blank">Joel Cohen</a> is a partner in the New York office of Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP. This post is based on an article by Mr. Cohen, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/mkdunning" target="_blank">Mary Kay Dunning</a> and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/gshill" target="_blank">Gregory H. Shill</a> that first appeared in the <em>Securities Litigation Journal</em>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Every decade or so, a new wave of interest in prosecuting insider trading emerges. <a name="1b"></a>We see this now. Just as the tides of interest in insider trading ebb and flow, so too do the contours of the offense itself. Given the present environment, of course, one would expect regulators to step up insider-trading enforcement, and they have. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2010/07/29/erosion-of-the-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-insider-trading-actions#1">[1]</a> This growing regulatory aggressiveness has coincided with judicial relaxation of the elements of insider-trading violations. Ensuring proper enforcement without inhibiting the free flow of information that regulators and the courts have historically recognized as vital to healthy markets truly has become a high-wire act.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/29/erosion-of-the-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-insider-trading-actions/#more-11474" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Erosion of the Fiduciary Duty Requirement in Insider Trading Actions">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/07/29/erosion-of-the-fiduciary-duty-requirement-in-insider-trading-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
