<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/10/applying-the-supreme-courts-limits-to-foreign-squared-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 13:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.9</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Applying the Supreme Court&#8217;s Limits to &#8220;Foreign Squared&#8221; Litigation</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/10/applying-the-supreme-courts-limits-to-foreign-squared-litigation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=applying-the-supreme-courts-limits-to-foreign-squared-litigation</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/10/applying-the-supreme-courts-limits-to-foreign-squared-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornwell v. Credit Suisse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign squared/cubed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 10b-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 10(b)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=11719?d=20150120100812EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the first significant opinion applying the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd., No. 08-1191 (U.S. June 24, 2010), the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled yesterday that Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 do not [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by George T. Conway III, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, August 10, 2010 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Conway,%20George%20T.%20III" target="_blank">George Conway</a> is partner in the Litigation Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton firm memorandum by Mr. Conway and <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Schwartz,%20Kevin%20S." target="_blank">Kevin S. Schwartz</a>. Additional posts relating to the decision in <em>Morrison v. National Australia Bank</em> are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/tag/morrison-v-national-australia/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In the first significant opinion applying the United States Supreme Court’s decision in <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-1191.pdf" target="_blank"><em>Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.</em>, No. 08-1191 (U.S. June 24, 2010)</a>, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled yesterday that Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 do not apply to “foreign squared” claims — claims asserted by American investors who have purchased securities of foreign issuers on foreign exchanges. <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/docs/Cornwelletal.v.CreditSuisseGroupetal.PDF" target="_blank"><em>Cornwell v. Credit Suisse Group</em>, No. 08 Civ. 3758 (S.D.N.Y. July 27, 2010)</a>.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/10/applying-the-supreme-courts-limits-to-foreign-squared-litigation/#more-11719" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Applying the Supreme Court&#8217;s Limits to &#8220;Foreign Squared&#8221; Litigation">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/10/applying-the-supreme-courts-limits-to-foreign-squared-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
