<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/26/concerns-about-new-proxy-access-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 11:30:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Concerns About New Proxy Access Rule</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/26/concerns-about-new-proxy-access-rule/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=concerns-about-new-proxy-access-rule</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/26/concerns-about-new-proxy-access-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulators Materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=12509?d=20100826104934EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: Troy A. Paredes is a Commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This post is based on Commissioner Paredes&#8217; statement at a recent open meeting of the SEC, which is available here. The views expressed in the post are those of Commissioner Paredes and do not necessarily reflect those of the Securities [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background: #F8F8F8;padding: 10px;margin-top: 5px;margin-bottom: 10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> <a href="http://www.sec.gov/about/commissioner/paredes.htm" target="_blank">Troy A. Paredes</a> is a Commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This post is based on Commissioner Paredes&#8217; statement at a recent open meeting of the SEC, which is available <a href="http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/2010/spch082510tap.htm" target="_blank">here</a>. The views expressed in the post are those of Commissioner Paredes and do not necessarily reflect those of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the other Commissioners, or the Staff. The post relates to the adoption of a final SEC rule on proxy access; the adopting release is available <a href="http://sec.gov/rules/final/2010/33-9136.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.  Additional posts relating to proxy access are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/tag/proxy-access/">here</a>.</div>
<p>Today, the Commission is adopting rule changes to provide shareholders with “proxy access.” New Exchange Act Rule 14a-11 creates for shareholders a minimum federal right of access to a company’s proxy materials to nominate directors. As amended, Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 will allow shareholders to include in a company’s proxy materials a proposal to amend the company’s bylaws to provide for proxy access, subject to a major exception. That is, shareholders are unable to opt out of the Rule 14a-11 access regime, even if they want to. The proxy access right the Commission is establishing under Rule 14a-11 is mandatory.</p>
<p>The Rule 14a-8 amendment facilitates shareholders in crafting what the shareholders believe to be an appropriate access regime for a particular company. I welcome the Rule 14a-8 amendment as a sensible step that empowers shareholders, respects the traditional role of states in regulating internal corporate affairs, and allows for efficient private ordering.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the Commission has chosen to do more than amend Rule 14a-8. The Commission also is adopting Rule 14a-11, the mandates of which displace private ordering and state law and negate the import and effect of shareholder choice when it comes to determining the contours of proxy access. Neither theory nor data adequately <a name="1b"></a>substantiate the Commission’s imposition of the mandatory Rule 14a-11 proxy access right. Accordingly, I am not able to support the final rule before us and respectfully dissent. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2010/08/26/concerns-about-new-proxy-access-rule#1">[1]</a></p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/26/concerns-about-new-proxy-access-rule/#more-12509" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Concerns About New Proxy Access Rule">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/08/26/concerns-about-new-proxy-access-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
