<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/11/11/sec-issues-proposed-rules-on-say-on-pay-voting-and-disclosures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 11:30:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC Issues Proposed Rules on Say-on-Pay Voting and Disclosures</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/11/11/sec-issues-proposed-rules-on-say-on-pay-voting-and-disclosures/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sec-issues-proposed-rules-on-say-on-pay-voting-and-disclosures</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/11/11/sec-issues-proposed-rules-on-say-on-pay-voting-and-disclosures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden parachutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=13793?d=20150120095853EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 18, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued proposed rules implementing the say-on-pay provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. [1] Section 951 of the Reform Act requires (1) a non-binding shareholder vote on executive compensation, (2) a non-binding vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote, (3) disclosure [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Scott Hirst, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Thursday, November 11, 2010 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">This post comes to us from <a href="http://www.shearman.com/jcannon/" target="_blank">John J. Cannon</a>, a partner in the Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits Group Shearman &amp; Sterling LLP, and is based on a Shearman &amp; Sterling Client Memorandum by Mr. Cannon, <a href="http://www.shearman.com/lrappaport/" target="_blank">Linda E. Rappaport</a>, <a href="http://www.shearman.com/jcrandall/" target="_blank">Jeffrey P. Crandall</a>, <a href="http://www.shearman.com/klaverriere/" target="_blank">Kenneth J. Laverriere</a> and <a href="http://www.shearman.com/dlilienfeld/" target="_blank">Doreen E. Lilienfeld</a>. Previous posts about the SEC&#8217;s say-on-pay regulations can be found <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/tag/say-on-pay/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p><a name="1b"></a>On October 18, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued proposed rules implementing the say-on-pay provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2010/11/11/sec-issues-proposed-rules-on-say-on-pay-voting-and-disclosures#1">[1]</a> Section 951 of the Reform Act requires (1) a non-binding shareholder vote on executive compensation, (2) a non-binding vote on the frequency of the say-on-pay vote, (3) disclosure of “golden parachute” arrangements in connection with specified change in control transactions, and (4) a non-binding shareholder vote on golden parachute arrangements in connection with these change in control transactions.</p>
<p>The proposed rules clear up many issues on say-on-pay left unanswered by the Reform Act and expand issuer disclosure obligations in ways not required by the Act.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/11/11/sec-issues-proposed-rules-on-say-on-pay-voting-and-disclosures/#more-13793" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Issues Proposed Rules on Say-on-Pay Voting and Disclosures">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2010/11/11/sec-issues-proposed-rules-on-say-on-pay-voting-and-disclosures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
