<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/01/31/law-professors-submit-amicus-brief-in-proxy-access-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 11:30:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Law Professors Submit Amicus Brief in Proxy Access Case</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/01/31/law-professors-submit-amicus-brief-in-proxy-access-case/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=law-professors-submit-amicus-brief-in-proxy-access-case</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/01/31/law-professors-submit-amicus-brief-in-proxy-access-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 14:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Roundtable v. SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 14a-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 14a-8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=15395?d=20110131095122EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: This post relates to a brief submitted by 36 law professors, including Professor Coates and Professor Victor Brudney, in the case of Business Roundtable and Chamber Of Commerce v. SEC. Boston College Law Professor Kent Greenfield led the organization of the group, and the brief was written by Jay Eisenhofer, Michael Barry and [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background: #F8F8F8;padding: 10px;margin-top: 5px;margin-bottom: 10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> This post relates to a brief submitted by 36 law professors, including Professor <a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=11" target="_blank">Coates</a> and Professor Victor Brudney, in the case of <em>Business Roundtable and Chamber Of Commerce v. SEC</em>. Boston College Law Professor Kent Greenfield led the organization of the group, and the brief was written by Jay Eisenhofer, Michael Barry and Ananda Chaudhuri of Grant &amp; Eisenhofer P.A. The amicus brief is available <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Roundtable-v-SEC-Law-Professors-Brief.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>. The brief relies on the recent <em>Harvard Law Review</em> article by Lucian Bebchuk and Robert Jackson, Jr, &#8220;Corporate Political Speech: Who Decides?&#8221; which is described on the Forum <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2010/09/08/corporate-political-speech-who-decides/">here</a>.</div>
<p>For seven years, the SEC deliberated whether to give shareholders direct access to the proxy statements mandated by federal law.  After the Business Roundtable and others raised doubts about the SEC’s authority to adopt proxy access, Congress considered for nearly a year whether to intervene and mandate it by statute.  In the end, Congress simply elected in the Dodd-Frank law to remove any doubt as to the SEC’s authority in the area.  At long last, the SEC in September adopted Rule 14a-11, which requires public companies to distribute information about candidates nominated by shareholders that have held 3+% of the voting stock for 3+ years.  </p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/01/31/law-professors-submit-amicus-brief-in-proxy-access-case/#more-15395" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Law Professors Submit Amicus Brief in Proxy Access Case">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/01/31/law-professors-submit-amicus-brief-in-proxy-access-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
