<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/23/a-test-of-ipo-theories-using-reverse-mergers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 11:32:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>A Test of IPO Theories Using Reverse Mergers</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/23/a-test-of-ipo-theories-using-reverse-mergers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-test-of-ipo-theories-using-reverse-mergers</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/23/a-test-of-ipo-theories-using-reverse-mergers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empirical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPOs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock returns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=15895?d=20150106100847EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the paper, A Test of IPO Theories Using Reverse Mergers, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we investigate many of the current theories explaining why IPO returns are large and significantly positive on the issuance date. Reverse mergers are an alternative method to IPOs for going public, and announcement day price reaction [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by R. Christopher Small, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Wednesday, February 23, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://mitsloan.mit.edu/faculty/detail.php?in_spseqno=SP000006&amp;co_list=F" target="_blank">Paul Asquith</a>, Professor of Finance at the M.I.T. Sloan School of Management, and <a href="http://www.chicagobooth.edu/faculty/bio.aspx?person_id=12825600000" target="_blank">Kevin Rock</a>, Professor of Finance at the Chicago Booth Graduate School of Business.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In the paper, <strong><em>A Test of IPO Theories Using Reverse Mergers</em></strong>, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we investigate many of the current theories explaining why IPO returns are large and significantly positive on the issuance date. Reverse mergers are an alternative method to IPOs for going public, and announcement day price reaction to private reverse mergers is comparable to the initial day price reaction to IPOs. In a private reverse merger, a private firm goes public by exchanging their stock for the stock in a public firm. After a reverse merger there are new stockholders, but the private firm’s old stockholders own the majority of public stock in the surviving firm. When we use reverse mergers as an out-of-sample test, most of the theories developed thus far to explain the market’s reaction to IPOs appear to be invalid.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/23/a-test-of-ipo-theories-using-reverse-mergers/#more-15895" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading A Test of IPO Theories Using Reverse Mergers">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/23/a-test-of-ipo-theories-using-reverse-mergers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
