<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/26/director-pay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 11:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Director Pay</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/26/director-pay/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=director-pay</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/26/director-pay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=15138?d=20150120093919EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the past decade, we have witnessed both a dramatic increase in the demands placed on directors of public companies and the scrutiny of boards’ actions. While the fundamental model of a director’s fiduciary duties under state law has remained mostly stable, in other precincts – including the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Jeremy L. Goldstein, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, February 26, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Goldstein,%20Jeremy%20L." target="_blank">Jeremy Goldstein</a> is a partner at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz active in the firm&#8217;s executive compensation and corporate governance practices. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton firm memorandum by Mr. Goldstein; the memo was also discussed by Peter Lattman in the <em>New York Times DealBook</em>, available <a href="http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/19/directors-underpaid-says-wachtell-lipton/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>During the past decade, we have witnessed both a dramatic increase in the demands placed on directors of public companies and the scrutiny of boards’ actions. While the fundamental model of a director’s fiduciary duties under state law has remained mostly stable, in other precincts – including the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators, ISS, institutional investors, politicians and the public – expectations about directors’ involvement and influence over a corporation have increased significantly.</p>
<p>An engaged, skilled and thoughtful board of directors adds immense value to a corporation. It is more difficult than ever to recruit and retain directors who meet the requirements – including the increased legal and regulatory requirements imposed within the past ten years – for experience, expertise, diversity, independence, leadership, collegiality and character. Competition for the best candidates is intense, particularly in view of the fact that the ideal director candidate is often a successful, independent and prominent person who does not need the exposure to the obligations that public company directorship entails.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/26/director-pay/#more-15138" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Director Pay">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/02/26/director-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
