<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/03/09/corporate-governance-and-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Corporate Governance and Innovation</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/03/09/corporate-governance-and-innovation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=corporate-governance-and-innovation</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/03/09/corporate-governance-and-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accounting & Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empirical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entrenchment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hostile takeover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&D]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=16364?d=20150106100710EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the paper, Corporate Governance and Innovation, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we examine the effect of corporate governance on innovation as measured by firm research and development (R&#38;D) expenditures. Two different perspectives dominate the academic literature on corporate governance. One perspective emphasizes principal-agent problems and suggests that executives who are protected [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by R. Christopher Small, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Wednesday, March 9, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://vs-www1.quinnipiac.edu/x1596.xml?School=BU&amp;Dept=FM&amp;Person=9963" target="_blank">Matthew O’Connor</a>, Professor of Finance at Quinnipiac University, and <a href="http://faculty.quinnipiac.edu/business/rafferty/homepage.html" target="_blank">Matthew Rafferty</a>, Professor of Economics at Quinnipiac University.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In the paper, <strong><em>Corporate Governance and Innovation</em></strong>, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we examine the effect of corporate governance on innovation as measured by firm research and development (R&amp;D) expenditures. Two different perspectives dominate the academic literature on corporate governance. One perspective emphasizes principal-agent problems and suggests that executives who are protected from shareholder pressure become entrenched. Entrenched executives pursue their own interests at the expense of shareholders. If executives prefer less-risky corporate strategies then an entrenched executive might reduce risky R&amp;D expenditures. An alternative perspective emphasizes that the threat of takeovers forces executives to focus on short-term results so long-term investments such as R&amp;D may suffer. An executive concerned about a takeover threat may reduce R&amp;D expenditures, which are not expensed, to increase short-term profits and stock prices to discourage a hostile takeover. This perspective suggests that entrenched executives who are free from the pressure of hostile takeovers may pursue more R&amp;D expenditures.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/03/09/corporate-governance-and-innovation/#more-16364" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Corporate Governance and Innovation">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/03/09/corporate-governance-and-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
