<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/12/delaware-court-of-chancery-addresses-multi-forum-deal-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 11:31:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Court of Chancery Addresses Multi-Forum Deal Litigation</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/12/delaware-court-of-chancery-addresses-multi-forum-deal-litigation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-court-of-chancery-addresses-multi-forum-deal-litigation</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/12/delaware-court-of-chancery-addresses-multi-forum-deal-litigation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forum selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going private]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In re Allion Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=17295?d=20150120093414EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pot of multi-forum stockholder litigation against deals continues to boil. The recent Allion decision, the subject of our recent memo, spotlights one solution that our Firm developed that has shown some promise. That litigation follows in the wake of a deal’s announcement is nothing new. But participants in the M&#38;A markets are still grappling [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Theodore Mirvis, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, April 12, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Mirvis,%20Theodore%20N." target="_blank">Theodore Mirvis</a> is a partner in the Litigation Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton firm memorandum by Mr. Mirvis, <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/WDSavitt" target="_blank">William Savitt</a> and <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/RAMcLeod" target="_blank">Ryan A. McLeod</a>. This post is part of the <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The pot of multi-forum stockholder litigation against deals continues to boil. The recent <em>Allion </em>decision, the subject of our recent memo, spotlights one solution that our Firm developed that has shown some promise.</p>
<p>That litigation follows in the wake of a deal’s announcement is nothing new. But participants in the M&amp;A markets are still grappling with the increasingly prevalent trend of multiple shareholder actions challenging the same deal in different courts. The Delaware Court of Chancery recently endorsed a pragmatic solution to this endemic problem. <em><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/docs/In_re_Alliion_Healthcare_Inc_Sholders_Litig.pdf" target="_blank">In re Allion Healthcare Inc. S’holders Litig., C.A. No. 5022-CC (Del. Ch. Mar. 29, 2011)</a></em>.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/12/delaware-court-of-chancery-addresses-multi-forum-deal-litigation/#more-17295" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Delaware Court of Chancery Addresses Multi-Forum Deal Litigation">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/12/delaware-court-of-chancery-addresses-multi-forum-deal-litigation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
