<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/30/comments-on-the-secs-proposal-for-beneficial-ownership-reporting-and-security-based-swaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Comments on the SEC’s Proposal for  Beneficial Ownership Reporting and Security-Based Swaps</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/30/comments-on-the-secs-proposal-for-beneficial-ownership-reporting-and-security-based-swaps/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=comments-on-the-secs-proposal-for-beneficial-ownership-reporting-and-security-based-swaps</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/30/comments-on-the-secs-proposal-for-beneficial-ownership-reporting-and-security-based-swaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 12:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beneficial owners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reporting regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=17511?d=20150120092904EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently we filed a comment letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its proposal to readopt existing rules to preserve the “status quo” with respect to the treatment of security-based swaps under the beneficial ownership reporting rules. Our letter reiterates our belief, as reflected in the rulemaking petition we filed In March with the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Theodore Mirvis, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Saturday, April 30, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/Page.cfm/Thread/Attorneys/SubThread/Search/Name/Mirvis,%20Theodore%20N." target="_blank">Theodore Mirvis</a> is a partner in the Litigation Department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton firm memorandum.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Recently we filed a <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/docs/WLRK_1765183v10.pdf" target="_blank">comment letter</a> with the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding its <a href="http://sec.gov/rules/proposed/2011/34-64087.pdf" target="_blank">proposal</a> to readopt existing rules to preserve the “status quo” with respect to the treatment of security-based swaps under the beneficial ownership reporting rules. Our letter reiterates our belief, as reflected in the <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/docs/Letter_to_the_SEC_re_%2013%28d%29%28final%20version%29.pdf" target="_blank">rulemaking petition</a> we filed In March with the Commission, that modernization of the beneficial ownership reporting rules is needed in order to compel timely, accurate and complete disclosure of the accumulation of control stakes in public companies. We urge the Commission to undertake a complete overhaul of the rules as promptly as reasonably practicable. Chief among the failings in need of correction are the outdated ten-day reporting window and the overly narrow definition of “beneficial ownership,” which excludes a host of derivative products commonly used by investors to acquire the characteristics of ownership while currently evading reporting requirements.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/30/comments-on-the-secs-proposal-for-beneficial-ownership-reporting-and-security-based-swaps/#more-17511" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Comments on the SEC’s Proposal for  Beneficial Ownership Reporting and Security-Based Swaps">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/04/30/comments-on-the-secs-proposal-for-beneficial-ownership-reporting-and-security-based-swaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
