<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/05/can-the-treasury-exempt-its-own-companies-from-tax-the-45-billion-gm-nol-carryforward/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 11:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Can the Treasury Exempt its Own Companies from Tax? The $45 Billion GM NOL Carryforward</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/05/can-the-treasury-exempt-its-own-companies-from-tax-the-45-billion-gm-nol-carryforward/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=can-the-treasury-exempt-its-own-companies-from-tax-the-45-billion-gm-nol-carryforward</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/05/can-the-treasury-exempt-its-own-companies-from-tax-the-45-billion-gm-nol-carryforward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banking & Financial Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empirical Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HLS Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOLs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treasury Department]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=18969?d=20230314095224EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Year after year, General Motors lost money &#8211; enormous sums of money. It designed cars. It built cars. But no one wanted to buy the cars it designed and built. Over time, it accumulated huge operating losses (&#8220;net operating losses,&#8221; or NOLs). The tax code let GM carry forward these NOLs into the future. It [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Mark Ramseyer, Harvard Law School, on Tuesday, July 5, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=54" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Mark Ramseyer</a> is a Professor of Japanese Legal Studies at Harvard Law School.</p>
</div></hgroup><div style="background: #F8F8F8; padding: 10px; margin-top: 5px; margin-bottom: 10px;">Year after year, General Motors lost money &#8211; enormous sums of money. It designed cars. It built cars. But no one wanted to buy the cars it designed and built. Over time, it accumulated huge operating losses (&#8220;net operating losses,&#8221; or NOLs). The tax code let GM carry forward these NOLs into the future. It let the firm save them for that day in the future when it would once again sell cars that people wanted.</div>
<p>The day never came. Instead, in June 2009 GM (or “Old GM”) declared bankruptcy. It filed under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and sold its assets to a new shell (New GM) in a transaction under Sec. 363 of the Code. Old GM&#8217;s shareholders were not part of New GM, and the firm&#8217;s creditors took stock: the US Treasury, the auto unions, and Canada swapped debt claims against Old GM for equity stakes in New GM. With 61 percent, the Treasury took the largest share among this group. Other Old GM creditors acquired a 10 percent stake in New GM as well. In the fall of 2010, Treasury re-sold a large amount of its New GM shares to the public, and cut its share to 26%.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/05/can-the-treasury-exempt-its-own-companies-from-tax-the-45-billion-gm-nol-carryforward/#more-18969" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Can the Treasury Exempt its Own Companies from Tax? The $45 Billion GM NOL Carryforward">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/05/can-the-treasury-exempt-its-own-companies-from-tax-the-45-billion-gm-nol-carryforward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
