<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/16/sec-enforcement-actions-against-outside-directors-offer-reminder-for-boards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 15:34:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC Enforcement Actions Against Outside Directors Offer Reminder for Boards</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/16/sec-enforcement-actions-against-outside-directors-offer-reminder-for-boards/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sec-enforcement-actions-against-outside-directors-offer-reminder-for-boards</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/16/sec-enforcement-actions-against-outside-directors-offer-reminder-for-boards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2011 15:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Conference Board]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=19192?d=20150113161700EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent months, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has brought two enforcement actions against independent directors of two publicly traded companies. While the commission historically has not pursued public company directors, it does so when it deems the directors to have knowingly permitted or facilitated violations of the securities laws. This report discusses these [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, on Saturday, July 16, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.conference-board.org/publications/bio.cfm?id=358" target="_blank">Matteo Tonello</a> is Director of Corporate Governance for The Conference Board, Inc. This post is based on a Conference Board <em>Director Note</em> by <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/agoodman" target="_blank">Amy L. Goodman</a> and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/jliu" target="_blank">Justin S. Liu</a> of Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP, and is adapted from a Gibson Dunn client memorandum titled “SEC Targets Directors Who Ignore Red Flags.”</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In recent months, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has brought two enforcement actions against independent directors of two publicly traded companies. While the commission historically has not pursued public company directors, it does so when it deems the directors to have knowingly permitted or facilitated violations of the securities laws. This report discusses these recent cases in light of the SEC’s historical position on such offenses and offers recommendations for how board members can mitigate their risks.</p>
<p>The SEC enforcement actions were against four independent directors at two publicly traded companies. While these actions reflect the SEC’s interest in bringing actions against these types of directors, they are <a name="tableb"></a>consistent with the commission’s historical practice of pursuing cases against independent directors only when it believes that they personally have engaged in violative conduct or have repeatedly ignored significant red flags (see “Historical SEC Actions against Outside Directors” <a href="#table">below</a>). One of the actions, which was brought as an administrative proceeding instead of as a complaint in federal court, illustrates how the commission may choose to use some of its new enforcement powers under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”).</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/16/sec-enforcement-actions-against-outside-directors-offer-reminder-for-boards/#more-19192" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Enforcement Actions Against Outside Directors Offer Reminder for Boards">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/07/16/sec-enforcement-actions-against-outside-directors-offer-reminder-for-boards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
