<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/bankruptcy-court-decision-may-impact-claims-trading-and-plan-negotiation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2026 11:30:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Court Decision May Impact Claims Trading and Plan Negotiation</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/bankruptcy-court-decision-may-impact-claims-trading-and-plan-negotiation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bankruptcy-court-decision-may-impact-claims-trading-and-plan-negotiation</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/bankruptcy-court-decision-may-impact-claims-trading-and-plan-negotiation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy & Financial Distress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debtor-creditor law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In re Washington Mutual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery & resolution plans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=22042?d=20150113160512EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 13, 2011, Judge Mary Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware surprised many parties in interest and observers of the case by issuing an opinion denying confirmation of the modified proposed plan of reorganization of Washington Mutual, Inc. (“WMI”) and its affiliated debtors. The modified plan incorporated certain [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Noam Noked, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Thursday, October 6, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post is based on a Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell LLP client newsletter by <a href="http://www.davispolk.com/lawyers/damian-schaible/" target="_blank">Damian Schaible</a>, <a href="http://www.davispolk.com/lawyers/donald-bernstein/" target="_blank">Donald Bernstein</a>, and <a href="http://www.davispolk.com/lawyers/marshall-huebner/" target="_blank">Marshall S. Huebner</a> from the Insolvency and Restructuring Practice at Davis Polk.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On September 13, 2011, Judge Mary Walrath of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware surprised many parties in interest and observers of the case by issuing an opinion denying confirmation of the modified proposed plan of reorganization of Washington Mutual, Inc. (“WMI”) and its affiliated debtors. The modified plan incorporated certain changes Judge Walrath had indicated were necessary in a January 2011 opinion denying confirmation of a prior version of the plan, and many expected that these changes would be sufficient to ensure confirmation of the modified plan. Although the decision turned primarily on the rate of post-petition interest awarded to certain creditors of WMI, the Court’s extensive discussion of allegations of “insider trading” raised against certain claims purchasers is likely to attract the most attention. Judge Walrath’s findings on these allegations may have a significant impact on claims trading and negotiation dynamics in complex chapter 11 cases going forward.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/bankruptcy-court-decision-may-impact-claims-trading-and-plan-negotiation/#more-22042" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Bankruptcy Court Decision May Impact Claims Trading and Plan Negotiation">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/bankruptcy-court-decision-may-impact-claims-trading-and-plan-negotiation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
