<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/say-on-pay-drives-compensation-program-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 11:31:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Say on Pay Drives Compensation Program Changes</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/say-on-pay-drives-compensation-program-changes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=say-on-pay-drives-compensation-program-changes</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/say-on-pay-drives-compensation-program-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 13:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clawbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=22085?d=20150105142404EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The arrival of say-on-pay (SOP) votes has renewed the focus of directors and senior management on striking the right balance between designing an effective executive compensation program that supports the company’s strategic business objectives and one that is sensitive to shareholder perspectives. As a result, many companies made changes to their compensation programs this year, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, on Thursday, October 6, 2011 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.conference-board.org/publications/bio.cfm?id=358" target="_blank">Matteo Tonello</a> is Director of Corporate Governance for The Conference Board, Inc. This post is based on a Conference Board <em>Director Note</em> by <a href="http://www.clearbridgecomp.com/about/our-team/russell-miller" target="_blank">Russell Miller</a> and <a href="http://www.clearbridgecomp.com/about/our-team/yonat-assayag" target="_blank">Yonat Assayag</a> of ClearBridge Compensation Group.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The arrival of say-on-pay (SOP) votes has renewed the focus of directors and senior management on striking the right balance between designing an effective executive compensation program that supports the company’s strategic business objectives and one that is sensitive to shareholder perspectives. As a result, many companies made changes to their compensation programs this year, aimed at enhancing the relationship between pay and performance in preparation for their first SOP votes. This report examines the changes made by some Fortune 500 companies and includes recommendations for companies to consider in their 2012 compensation decision-making.</p>
<p>An analysis of the first 100 proxy filings by Fortune 500 companies (First 100) subject to shareholder advisory <a name="1b"></a>votes under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act demonstrates some of the real effects SOP has had on executive compensation. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2011/10/06/say-on-pay-drives-compensation-program-changes#1">[1]</a> A key learning from those filings is that companies that perform and successfully demonstrate that their pay programs support and drive performance are more likely to win shareholder SOP votes.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/say-on-pay-drives-compensation-program-changes/#more-22085" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Say on Pay Drives Compensation Program Changes">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/06/say-on-pay-drives-compensation-program-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
