<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/11/a-two-pronged-approach-to-reforming-international-corporate-taxes-in-the-u-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 14:55:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>A Two-Pronged Approach to Reforming International Corporate Taxes in the U.S</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/11/a-two-pronged-approach-to-reforming-international-corporate-taxes-in-the-u-s/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-two-pronged-approach-to-reforming-international-corporate-taxes-in-the-u-s</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/11/a-two-pronged-approach-to-reforming-international-corporate-taxes-in-the-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Op-Eds & Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign income]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=22140?d=20111011100811EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: Robert Pozen is a senior lecturer at Harvard Business School and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. This post is based on an article that first appeared in Tax Notes International, which is available (including footnotes) here. The current system for taxing the income of controlled foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations — [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background: #F8F8F8;padding: 10px;margin-top: 5px;margin-bottom: 10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> <a href="http://bobpozen.com/" target="_blank">Robert Pozen</a> is a senior lecturer at Harvard Business School and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. This post is based on an article that first appeared in <em>Tax Notes International</em>, which is available (including footnotes) <a href="http://bobpozen.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Tax-Notes-27Sept.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<p>The current system for taxing the income of controlled foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations — foreign-source income — makes no sense for U.S. multinational companies or the U.S. Treasury. In theory, foreign-source income is taxed at the standard U.S. corporate tax rate of 35 percent; in practice, Treasury generally receives no taxes on foreign-source income as long as it is held overseas. In fact, U.S. corporations now hold abroad an estimated $1.5 trillion in cash, which the current system encourages them to deploy by acquiring foreign companies and building overseas facilities. </p>
<p>In response, some U.S. multinationals are lobbying for a tax holiday on repatriation of their foreign-source income, similar to the one enacted in 2004. Such a tax holiday would reduce the effective tax rate on those repatriations to 5.25 percent for a limited time period, for example one year. This proposal for another tax holiday is reportedly gathering steam in some circles of liberal Democrats.</p>
<p>Another tax holiday for repatriated foreign profits would be a transition to nowhere. It does not address the fundamental problems of the current tax system. Indeed, it reinforces the incentives for U.S. multinationals to keep their foreign profits in overseas accounts — waiting for the next tax holiday. </p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/11/a-two-pronged-approach-to-reforming-international-corporate-taxes-in-the-u-s/#more-22140" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading A Two-Pronged Approach to Reforming International Corporate Taxes in the U.S">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/10/11/a-two-pronged-approach-to-reforming-international-corporate-taxes-in-the-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
