<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/02/registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 11:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Registration of Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Participants</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/02/registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/02/registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Banking & Financial Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker-dealers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps entities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=22746?d=20111102094419EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: Annette Nazareth is a partner in the Financial Institutions Group at Davis Polk &#38; Wardwell LLP. This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum. On October 12, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) proposed, by a 3-1 vote, rules under the Dodd-Frank Act to provide for [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background: #F8F8F8;padding: 10px;margin-top: 5px;margin-bottom: 10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> <a href="http://www.davispolk.com/lawyers/annette-nazareth/" target="_blank">Annette Nazareth</a> is a partner in the Financial Institutions Group at Davis Polk &amp; Wardwell LLP.  This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum.</div>
<p>On October 12, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) proposed, by a 3-1 <a name="1b"></a>vote, rules under the Dodd-Frank Act to provide for the registration of security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants (“SBS Entities”). <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2011/11/02/registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants#1">[1]</a> The SEC’s proposal (the “Proposal”) draws heavily upon existing SEC registration regimes and has taken into account the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s registration requirements for swap dealers and major swap participants. Under the Proposal, market participants registered as both an SBS Entity and a broker-dealer are subject to a “similar and complementary registration regime.” To avoid unnecessary duplication, the Proposal would permit SBS Entities that are otherwise registered or registering as intermediaries with either the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) to complete streamlined application forms. </p>
<p>The Proposal departs from the broker-dealer registration regime in what is likely to be its most controversial  <a name="2b"></a>provision, requiring a “Senior Officer Certification” of the SBS Entity’s financial, operational, and compliance capabilities as part of the application for registration. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2011/11/02/registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants#2">[2]</a> The Proposal does not include rules permitting registration on a “limited designation” basis, but seeks comment on this topic. </p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/02/registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants/#more-22746" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Registration of Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Participants">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/02/registration-of-security-based-swap-dealers-and-major-participants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
