<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/03/2011-2012-iss-policy-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 11:30:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>2011-2012 ISS Policy Survey</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/03/2011-2012-iss-policy-survey/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2011-2012-iss-policy-survey</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/03/2011-2012-iss-policy-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=22649?d=20111103093505EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: Carol Bowie is Head of Compensation Research Development at Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. This post is based on the key findings of the complete ISS Policy Survey, available here. Top Governance Issues Executive compensation continues to be an American issue for a second straight year. Only for North America, a majority of both [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> <strong>Carol Bowie</strong> is Head of Compensation Research Development at Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. This post is based on the key findings of the complete ISS Policy Survey, available <a href="http://www.issgovernance.com/files/PolicySurveyResults2011.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<p><span style="font-size:14px"><strong>Top Governance Issues</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Executive compensation continues to be an American issue for a second straight year.</strong> Only for North America, a majority of both investor (60 percent) and issuer respondents (61 percent) cite the perennial issue of executive compensation as one of the top three governance topics for the coming year, similar to last year&#8217;s survey results. </p>
<p><strong>On a global basis, investor respondents focused on board independence.</strong> Across every region, board independence was identified among the three most important governance topics by approximately 40 percent of investor respondents. </p>
<p><strong>Issuers focus on risk oversight in North America and Europe.</strong> For issuers, the second most commonly cited topic in North America was risk oversight. In Europe, risk oversight was commonly cited along with board competence. </p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/03/2011-2012-iss-policy-survey/#more-22649" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading 2011-2012 ISS Policy Survey">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2011/11/03/2011-2012-iss-policy-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
