<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/11/proposed-federal-rules-regarding-alternatives-to-credit-ratings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Proposed Federal Rules Regarding Alternatives to Credit Ratings</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/11/proposed-federal-rules-regarding-alternatives-to-credit-ratings/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=proposed-federal-rules-regarding-alternatives-to-credit-ratings</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/11/proposed-federal-rules-regarding-alternatives-to-credit-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ratings agencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=24777?d=20150113152851EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal banking agencies have recently issued three notices of proposed rulemaking (and applicable related guidance) in connection with the implementation of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). Section 939A generally requires that all Federal agencies remove from their regulations references to and requirements of reliance [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by H. Rodgin Cohen, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, January 11, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.sullcrom.com/cohenhrodgin/" target="_blank">H. Rodgin Cohen</a> is a partner and senior chairman of Sullivan &amp; Cromwell LLP focusing on acquisition, corporate governance, regulatory and securities law matters. This post is based on the executive summary of a Sullivan &amp; Cromwell publication by <a href="http://www.sullcrom.com/gladinandrewr/" target="_blank">Andrew Gladin</a> and <a href="http://www.sullcrom.com/alfonsojoel/" target="_blank">Joel Alfonso</a>; the complete publication is available <a href="http://www.sullcrom.com/Credit-Rating-Alternatives-12-16-2011/" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The Federal banking agencies have recently issued three notices of proposed rulemaking (and applicable related guidance) in connection with the implementation of Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). Section 939A generally requires that all Federal agencies remove from their regulations references to and requirements of reliance on credit ratings and replace them with appropriate alternatives for evaluating creditworthiness.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 14px;"><strong>Market Risk Capital NPR:</strong></span></p>
<p>The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC” and, together with the Federal Reserve and the OCC, the “agencies”) issued a joint notice of proposed rulemaking (the “Market Risk Capital NPR”) concerning their market risk capital rules applicable to certain U.S. banking organizations with significant trading operations by proposing standards of creditworthiness to be used in place of credit ratings when calculating the specific risk capital requirements for covered debt and securitization positions, including the following:</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/11/proposed-federal-rules-regarding-alternatives-to-credit-ratings/#more-24777" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Proposed Federal Rules Regarding Alternatives to Credit Ratings">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/11/proposed-federal-rules-regarding-alternatives-to-credit-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
