<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/12/2011-annual-corporate-governance-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 18:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>2011 Annual Corporate Governance Review</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/12/2011-annual-corporate-governance-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2011-annual-corporate-governance-review</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/12/2011-annual-corporate-governance-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 14:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgeson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay for performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=24971?d=20150113152844EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past decade has been a whirlwind for corporate governance in America. Since 2001, we have witnessed a myriad of scandals, epic corporate failures and legislative and regulatory attempts to prevent more of the same. Early on it was the failure of firms such as Enron, WorldCom and Global Crossing. More recently, the failure of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Noam Noked, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Thursday, January 12, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following comes to us from <a href="http://www.georgeson.com/usa/bios/daviddrake.php" target="_blank">David Drake</a>, President of Georgeson Inc, and is based on the executive summary of Georgeson&#8217;s <em>2011 Annual Corporate Governance Review</em> by Mr. Drake, <a href="http://www.georgeson.com/usa/bios/rhondabrauer.php" target="_blank">Rhonda L. Brauer</a>, <a href="http://www.georgeson.com/usa/bios/rajeevkumar.php" target="_blank">Rajeev Kumar</a>, Steven Pantina, and <a href="http://www.georgeson.com/usa/bios/rachelposner.php" target="_blank">Rachel Posner</a>. The full review is available for download <a href="http://www.georgeson.com/usa/acgr.php" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The past decade has been a whirlwind for corporate governance in America. Since 2001, we have witnessed a myriad of scandals, epic corporate failures and legislative and regulatory attempts to prevent more of the same. Early on it was the failure of firms such as Enron, WorldCom and Global Crossing. More recently, the failure of financial stalwarts like Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and AIG nearly pushed our markets to the brink of collapse. These failures have ushered in a new era of shareholder activism and corporate governance initiatives, including extensive legislative reform efforts and new rules by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).</p>
<p>While many of the proxy-related reforms have focused on enhanced disclosure requirements (the SEC has approved expansive new rules around director experience and qualifications, board leadership structure, board risk oversight responsibilities and Compensation Disclosure and Analysis (CD&amp;A) disclosure), new regulations have been put in place that fundamentally shift what issues are considered by shareholder at annual meetings in the United States.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/12/2011-annual-corporate-governance-review/#more-24971" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading 2011 Annual Corporate Governance Review">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/12/2011-annual-corporate-governance-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
