<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/26/considerations-for-public-company-directors-in-the-2012-proxy-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Considerations for Public Company Directors in the 2012 Proxy Season</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/26/considerations-for-public-company-directors-in-the-2012-proxy-season/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=considerations-for-public-company-directors-in-the-2012-proxy-season</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/26/considerations-for-public-company-directors-in-the-2012-proxy-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Board leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk oversight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=25098?d=20150113152455EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The past year has been one of change and challenge for public companies and their boards, as companies have moved to implement &#8220;say-on-pay&#8221; and other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (&#8220;Dodd-Frank&#8221;). With the 2012 proxy season on the horizon, public companies and their directors will continue to feel the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by John F. Olson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Georgetown Law Center, on Thursday, January 26, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jolson" target="_blank">John Olson</a> is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher&#8217;s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. This post is based on a Gibson Dunn alert.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The past year has been one of change and challenge for public companies and their boards, as companies have moved to implement &#8220;say-on-pay&#8221; and other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (&#8220;Dodd-Frank&#8221;). With the 2012 proxy season on the horizon, public companies and their directors will continue to feel the impact of Dodd-Frank as the Securities and Exchange Commission (&#8220;SEC&#8221;) proceeds with its ongoing efforts to implement the law. At the same time, public companies and their boards are operating in an environment where the balance of power between boards and shareholders continues to shift. The traditional, board-centric model of corporate governance continues to gravitate toward a paradigm that includes an increased role for shareholders. Activist shareholders are seeking greater participation in companies&#8217; governance and operations, and they are exerting increased pressure on companies to adopt so-called corporate governance &#8220;best practices.&#8221;</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/26/considerations-for-public-company-directors-in-the-2012-proxy-season/#more-25098" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Considerations for Public Company Directors in the 2012 Proxy Season">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/26/considerations-for-public-company-directors-in-the-2012-proxy-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
