<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/30/tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Tightening the Limits on Big US Banks</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/30/tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/30/tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Banking & Financial Institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Capital requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt-equity ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liquidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stress tests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=25147?d=20150113152441EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Reserve on December 20 issued its proposal to implement heightened prudential requirements for the largest US financial institutions as a result of the ongoing financial crisis. These institutions will have to design and implement compliance, recordkeeping and reporting procedures for the new standards in addition to the multitude of new restrictions imposed by [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Bradley K. Sabel, Shearman & Sterling LLP, on Monday, January 30, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.shearman.com/bsabel/" target="_blank">Bradley Sabel</a> is a partner at Shearman &amp; Sterling LLP. This post is based on a Shearman &amp; Sterling client publication by Mr. Sabel, <a href="http://www.shearman.com/dlamson/" target="_blank">Donald N. Lamson</a>, and <a href="http://www.shearman.com/grozansky/" target="_blank">Gregg L. Rozansky</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>The Federal Reserve on December 20 issued its proposal to implement heightened prudential requirements for the largest US financial institutions as a result of the ongoing financial crisis. These institutions will have to design and implement compliance, recordkeeping and reporting procedures for the new standards in addition to the multitude of new restrictions imposed by such reforms as the Volcker Rule. The following summarizes the new proposal, identifies the portions applicable to various types of covered financial institutions and outlines the various requirements applicable to each type. Covered institutions may take some solace, though perhaps not much, in the fact that many of the requirements are consistent with emerging international standards for supervision of large financial companies.</p>
<p>The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) requires that the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) impose enhanced supervisory requirements on the largest bank holding companies – in general, those with at least $50 billion, but with respect to certain requirements, those <a name="1b"></a>with at least $10 billion assets – and those nonbank financial companies designated as requiring <a name="2b"></a>supervision as though they were bank holding companies. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/01/30/tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks#1">[1]</a> The Federal Reserve’s proposal (the “Proposal”) provides detail on how several of the requirements would be implemented. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/01/30/tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks#2">[2]</a> Comments are due by March 31, 2012.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/30/tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks/#more-25147" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Tightening the Limits on Big US Banks">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/01/30/tightening-the-limits-on-big-us-banks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
