<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/05/08/continuing-developments-in-the-2012-proxy-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 11:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Continuing Developments in the 2012 Proxy Season</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/05/08/continuing-developments-in-the-2012-proxy-season/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=continuing-developments-in-the-2012-proxy-season</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/05/08/continuing-developments-in-the-2012-proxy-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=28546?d=20120508103300EDT</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Stuart N. Alperin and Regina Olshan, partners in the Executive Compensation and Benefits group at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &#38; Flom LLP, and is based on a Skadden alert. This alert is the second in a series; the prior alert is available here. As we continue [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px"><strong>Editor’s Note:</strong> The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.skadden.com/index.cfm?contentID=45&amp;bioID=3" target="_blank">Stuart N. Alperin</a> and <a href="http://www.skadden.com/index.cfm?contentID=45&amp;bioID=100" target="_blank">Regina Olshan</a>, partners in the Executive Compensation and Benefits group at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &amp; Flom LLP, and is based on a Skadden alert. This alert is the second in a series; the prior alert is available <a href="http://www.skadden.com/newsletters/Say_on_Pay_Early_Lessons_From_the_2012_Proxy_Season.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</div>
<p>As we continue to monitor developments in the unfolding 2012 proxy season, here are some key themes that have emerged thus far:</p>
<p>What are the overall vote results?</p>
<p>Of the first 180 companies of the Russell 3000 to report the results of say-on-pay proposals, approximately:</p>
<ul>
<li>65 percent have passed with more than 90 percent support;</li>
<li>25 percent have passed with between 70.1 percent and 90 percent support;</li>
<li>8 percent have passed with between 50 percent and 70 percent support;</li>
<li>2 percent (three companies) obtained less than 50 percent support — Actuant and International Game Technology were discussed in <a href="http://www.skadden.com/newsletters/Say_on_Pay_Early_Lessons_From_the_2012_Proxy_Season.pdf" target="_blank">our prior mailing</a> and KB Home is discussed below. In a vote result reported after the cutoff date for the calculations above, news reports indicated that Citigroup Inc.’s say-on-pay proposal received 45 percent of votes cast, making it the fourth company (and the largest company) whose say-on-pay proposal has received less than 50 percent support this year.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thus far, these percentages are not materially different from the full-year results for the 2011 proxy season.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/05/08/continuing-developments-in-the-2012-proxy-season/#more-28546" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Continuing Developments in the 2012 Proxy Season">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/05/08/continuing-developments-in-the-2012-proxy-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
