<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/18/sec-staff-guidance-on-shareholder-proposals-during-2012-proxy-season/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:41:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>SEC Staff Guidance on Shareholder Proposals During 2012 Proxy Season</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/18/sec-staff-guidance-on-shareholder-proposals-during-2012-proxy-season/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=sec-staff-guidance-on-shareholder-proposals-during-2012-proxy-season</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/18/sec-staff-guidance-on-shareholder-proposals-during-2012-proxy-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder proposals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=29581?d=20150113142033EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There have been a number of significant shareholder proposals submitted during the 2012 proxy season to date. This alert summarizes notable responses by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the &#8220;SEC&#8221;) staff (the &#8220;Staff&#8221;) to no-action requests concerning many of these shareholder proposals. By way of background, according to Institutional Shareholder Services (&#8220;ISS&#8221;), 1,105 proposals have [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by John F. Olson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and Georgetown Law Center, on Monday, June 18, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jolson" target="_blank">John Olson</a> is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher&#8217;s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. This post is based on a Gibson Dunn alert, available (including footnotes) <a href="http://gibsondunn.com/publications/Pages/SECStaffGuidance-ShareholderProposals-2012ProxySeason.aspx" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>There have been a number of significant shareholder proposals submitted during the 2012 proxy season to date. This alert summarizes notable responses by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the &#8220;SEC&#8221;) staff (the &#8220;Staff&#8221;) to no-action requests concerning many of these shareholder proposals. By way of background, according to Institutional Shareholder Services (&#8220;ISS&#8221;), 1,105 proposals have been submitted to companies to date for 2012 annual meetings. As of May 22, 2012, 303 no-action requests had been submitted to the SEC since October 1, 2011. This is comparable to the number of shareholder proposal no-action requests submitted during a similar period in 2011. Moreover, repeating the experience in 2011, the number of requests for reconsideration submitted by both companies and proponents was high. In addition, many companies successfully negotiated with proponents to withdraw shareholder proposals, illustrating that engagement with proponents can often eliminate the need to file a no-action request.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/18/sec-staff-guidance-on-shareholder-proposals-during-2012-proxy-season/#more-29581" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading SEC Staff Guidance on Shareholder Proposals During 2012 Proxy Season">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/18/sec-staff-guidance-on-shareholder-proposals-during-2012-proxy-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
