<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/20/standstills-in-change-of-control-transactions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 11:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Standstills in Change of Control Transactions</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/20/standstills-in-change-of-control-transactions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=standstills-in-change-of-control-transactions</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/20/standstills-in-change-of-control-transactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Change in control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiduciary duties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Standstill agreement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=29817?d=20150105111325EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Standstill agreements are ubiquitous in public company M&#38;A deals. In fact, the execution of a standstill has been described as the “cost of entry” into negotiations and serves to indicate a bidder’s seriousness. Despite their ubiquity, there is surprisingly little Delaware case law on standstills and even less academic literature on the subject. In my [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by R. Christopher Small, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.law.lsu.edu/index.cfm?geaux=profiles.showbio&amp;personnel=4EE20F2F-1372-69E5-F78B96A3ECFA2ADF" target="_blank">Christina Sautter</a>, Associate Professor of Law at Louisiana State University. This post is part of the <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Standstill agreements are ubiquitous in public company M&amp;A deals. In fact, the execution of a standstill has been described as the “cost of entry” into negotiations and serves to indicate a bidder’s seriousness. Despite their ubiquity, there is surprisingly little Delaware case law on standstills and even less academic literature on the subject. In my paper, <a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2020828" target="_blank">Promises Made to be Broken? Standstill Agreements in Change of Control Transactions</a>, forthcoming in the <em>Delaware Journal of Corporate Law</em>, I attempt to begin to fill this gap in academic literature by examining and providing a blueprint for the resolution of various issues raised by the execution and enforcement of standstills in the context of sales resulting in a change of corporate control.</p>
<p>My paper concentrates on three issues the Delaware courts have yet to tackle: a target board’s ability to consider a third-party superior offer made in contravention of a standstill; a board’s promise not to waive a standstill; and a board’s ability to grant a “winning” bidder the right to enforce a previously executed standstill against a “losing” bidder. Each of these issues raises a conflict between two fundamental principles of Delaware M&amp;A law: 1) a board’s <em>Revlon </em>duty to maximize stockholder value in a sale of corporate control; and 2) the sanctioning of certain deal protection provisions as permitted by the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in <em>Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.</em> and its progeny. As commonly argued, the availability of deal protection devices, including standstills and other promises made in relation to standstills, may assist a target board in extracting more value from bidders, thereby facilitating satisfaction of a board’s <em>Revlon </em>duties. Thus, at the pre-signing stage there may be good reason for a target board to agree to a standstill, and the provision may be permissible under <em>Unocal</em> but, pre-closing, the provision may inhibit the fulfillment of a board’s <em>Revlon</em> duties. Specifically, standstills may prevent a board from considering a third-party offer or deter a third party bound by a standstill from making an overbid in the first place.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/20/standstills-in-change-of-control-transactions/#more-29817" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Standstills in Change of Control Transactions">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/20/standstills-in-change-of-control-transactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
