<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/22/lessons-from-the-aol-proxy-fight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 11:32:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Lessons from the AOL Proxy Fight</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/22/lessons-from-the-aol-proxy-fight/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lessons-from-the-aol-proxy-fight</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/22/lessons-from-the-aol-proxy-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director nominations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proxy contests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder activism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=30144?d=20150113142019EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AOL’s shareholders delivered a resounding victory recently to the Company’s management and board in re-electing the full slate of incumbent director nominees — over ISS recommended dissident directors nominated by activist hedge fund Starboard Value LP. The victory represents a clear and powerful message that a well-developed and well-articulated business strategy for long-term success will [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Martin Lipton, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Friday, June 22, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/mlipton" target="_blank">Martin Lipton</a> is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton memorandum by Mr. Lipton, <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/deshapiro" target="_blank">David E. Shapiro</a>, <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/rcchen" target="_blank">Ronald C. Chen</a>, and <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/lbschwartz" target="_blank">Lisa B. Schwartz</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>AOL’s shareholders delivered a resounding victory recently to the Company’s management and board in re-electing the full slate of incumbent director nominees — over ISS recommended dissident directors nominated by activist hedge fund Starboard Value LP. The victory represents a clear and powerful message that a well-developed and well-articulated business strategy for long-term success will be supported by investors notwithstanding activist generated criticism and ISS support.</p>
<p>For several months, Starboard waged a damaging proxy fight to elect its own slate of three directors to the AOL board. The board and management of AOL countered Starboard’s destructive campaign by presenting, and continuing to execute on, their plan for long-term business value. AOL warned that Starboard had no viable business plan and was pursuing a short-term, value-destructive, and self-interested strategy. Nevertheless, ISS chose to cast its support with two of Starboard’s nominees, in part relying on the wrongheaded notion that the dissident nominations posed “little risk”. In doing so, ISS chose to support a dissident fund notwithstanding the fund’s lack of understanding of the Company’s fundamental business model.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/22/lessons-from-the-aol-proxy-fight/#more-30144" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Lessons from the AOL Proxy Fight">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/06/22/lessons-from-the-aol-proxy-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
