<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/09/binding-say-on-pay-in-the-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:31:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Binding Say on Pay in the UK</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/09/binding-say-on-pay-in-the-uk/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=binding-say-on-pay-in-the-uk</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/09/binding-say-on-pay-in-the-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 13:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Corporate Governance & Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Say on pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=30302?d=20150113141614EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this year we reported on the UK Government&#8217;s proposals to give shareholders of companies greater influence over executive pay through the use of binding votes. Since the draft proposals were announced the UK has seen the so-called &#8220;Shareholder Spring&#8221; with majority votes against remuneration reports under the current &#8216;advisory&#8217; (non-binding) regime at Aviva, Cairn [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Amy L. Goodman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Monday, July 9, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/agoodman" target="_blank">Amy Goodman</a> is a partner and co-chair of the Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance practice group at Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP. This post is based on a Gibson Dunn memo by Ms. Goodman, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/jbarabas" target="_blank">James Barabas</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jacox" target="_blank">James A. Cox</a>, <a href="http://gibsondunn.com/Lawyers/jroberts" target="_blank">Jeffery Roberts</a>, and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/eising" target="_blank">Elizabeth A. Ising</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Earlier this year we <a href="http://gibsondunn.com/publications/Pages/ProposalsForBindingShareholderVotes-UKExecutivePay.aspx" target="_blank">reported</a> on the UK Government&#8217;s proposals to give shareholders of companies greater influence over executive pay through the use of binding votes.</p>
<p>Since the draft proposals were announced the UK has seen the so-called &#8220;Shareholder Spring&#8221; with majority votes against remuneration reports under the current &#8216;advisory&#8217; (non-binding) regime at Aviva, Cairn Energy, Pendragon, and WPP; and sizeable votes against the reports at Xstrata (40% against), Barclays, Cookson and UBM (approx. 25% or more against) amongst others.</p>
<p>Building on the momentum created by shareholders on June 20, 2012, the UK Government <a href="http://www.bis.gov.uk/news/topstories/2012/Jun/directors-pay-reform" target="_blank">announced</a> its detailed proposals for a far-reaching reform of the approval mechanism for executive pay, including the use of binding votes. The proposals will likely apply (we await detail) to so-called &#8216;quoted companies&#8217; (see further below).</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/09/binding-say-on-pay-in-the-uk/#more-30302" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Binding Say on Pay in the UK">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/09/binding-say-on-pay-in-the-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
