<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/10/a-growing-divide-between-compliance-haves-and-have-nots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>A Growing Divide Between Compliance Have’s and Have-Not’s</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/10/a-growing-divide-between-compliance-haves-and-have-nots/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-growing-divide-between-compliance-haves-and-have-nots</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/10/a-growing-divide-between-compliance-haves-and-have-nots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislative & Regulatory Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance & ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSGO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=30326?d=20150113141610EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Semi-Tough: A Short History of Compliance and Ethics Program Law, presented at a May 2012 RAND Symposium on Corporate Culture and Ethical Leadership Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: What Should Boards, Management and Policymakers Do Now, I explore the legacy of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (“FSGO”) with respect to compliance and ethics [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Scott Hirst, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Tuesday, July 10, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.kaplanwalker.com/attorneys.htm?cf=jk" target="_blank">Jeffrey M. Kaplan</a>, partner at Kaplan &amp; Walker LLP.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In <a href="http://conflictofinterestblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Rand-Kaplan-White-Paper-post-publication4.pdf" target="_blank">Semi-Tough: A Short History of Compliance and Ethics Program Law</a>, presented at a May 2012 RAND Symposium on <em>Corporate Culture and Ethical Leadership Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: What Should Boards, Management and Policymakers Do Now</em>, I explore the legacy of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations (“FSGO”) with respect to compliance and ethics (“C&amp;E”) programs.</p>
<p>Since the advent of the FSGO in November 1991, the legal drivers for corporations to implement strong C&amp;E programs have seemed to be ever on the increase, at least in the U.S. Indeed, the past few years alone have seen:</p>
<ul>
<li>Rigorous enforcement, to an unprecedented extent, of the Foreign Corruption Practices Act (“FCPA”) – a law which, because of its internal controls provisions, strongly encourages companies to have effective C&amp;E programs.</li>
<li>The imposition, also to an extent never before seen, of very large federal criminal fines, including but by no means limited to those meted out in FCPA cases.</li>
<li>The initiation of a significant number of “Caremark” claims alleging failures by directors to oversee sufficiently their respective companies’ C&amp;E programs.</li>
<li>Revisions in 2010 to the FSGO to encourage independent C&amp;E officer functions.</li>
<li>Numerous other subject-matter-specific legal developments including (but by no means limited to) those regarding government contracting and energy utilities.</li>
</ul>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/10/a-growing-divide-between-compliance-haves-and-have-nots/#more-30326" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading A Growing Divide Between Compliance Have’s and Have-Not’s">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/10/a-growing-divide-between-compliance-haves-and-have-nots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
