<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/23/institutional-shareholders-and-their-oversight-of-executive-compensation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Institutional Shareholders and Their &#8220;Oversight&#8221; of Executive Compensation</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/23/institutional-shareholders-and-their-oversight-of-executive-compensation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=institutional-shareholders-and-their-oversight-of-executive-compensation</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/23/institutional-shareholders-and-their-oversight-of-executive-compensation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Executive Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institutional Investors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oversight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=30850?d=20150113141202EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s post addresses the increasing influence of institutional shareholders on executive pay. Prior posts have examined the role of proxy advisors in giving advice on how shareholders, especially institutional shareholders, should vote on say-on-pay under Dodd-Frank Section 951. [1] Today&#8217;s discussion focuses on the institutional shareholders themselves. While institutional shareholders own a major portion of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Joseph E. Bachelder III, Law Offices of Joseph E. Bachelder, on Monday, July 23, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.jebachelder.com/bios/jeb.html" target="_blank">Joseph Bachelder</a> is founder and senior partner of the Bachelder Law Firm. This post is based on an article by Mr. Bachelder, with assistance from <a href="http://www.jebachelder.com/bios/dtl.html" target="_blank">David T. Ling</a> and <a href="http://www.jebachelder.com/bios/at.html" target="_blank">Andy Tsang</a>, which first appeared in the <em>New York Law Journal</em>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Today&#8217;s post addresses the increasing influence of institutional shareholders on executive pay. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/tag/joseph-bachelder/">Prior posts</a> have examined the role of proxy <a name="1b"></a>advisors in giving advice on how shareholders, especially institutional shareholders, should vote on say-on-pay under Dodd-Frank Section 951. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/07/23/institutional-shareholders-and-their-oversight-of-executive-compensation#1">[1]</a> Today&#8217;s discussion focuses on the institutional shareholders themselves.</p>
<p>While institutional shareholders own a major portion of the share value of U.S. public corporations, the &#8220;ultimate owners&#8221; are, to a large extent, millions of individuals for whose benefit the equity in these corporations is being held by the institutional shareholders. (These individuals will be referred to in the post as &#8220;ultimate owners.&#8221;)</p>
<p>The original setting-aside of the assets that are the source of these investments is made by the individuals themselves or by others on their behalf (such as by their employers). These assets of the ultimate owners are being held for purposes such as educating children, providing for retirement, protecting against casualty and providing health and life insurance.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/23/institutional-shareholders-and-their-oversight-of-executive-compensation/#more-30850" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Institutional Shareholders and Their &#8220;Oversight&#8221; of Executive Compensation">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/07/23/institutional-shareholders-and-their-oversight-of-executive-compensation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
