<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/19/california-court-acknowledges-quasi-california-corporation-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 11:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>California Court Acknowledges &#8220;Quasi-California Corporation&#8221; Decision</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/19/california-court-acknowledges-quasi-california-corporation-decision/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=california-court-acknowledges-quasi-california-corporation-decision</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/19/california-court-acknowledges-quasi-california-corporation-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incorporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=33071?d=20150113140038EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Companies incorporated outside of California but with significant California contacts (so-called &#8220;quasi-California corporations&#8221;) have struggled with exactly how to comply with the long-arm statute found in Section 2115 of the California Corporations Code. The statute purports to impose a number of provisions of the California Corporations Code on quasi-California corporations, including the state&#8217;s requirement to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Larry Sonsini, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Wednesday, September 19, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wsgr.com/wsgr/dbindex.aspx?sectionname=attorneys/bios/113.htm" target="_blank">Larry Sonsini</a> is chairman of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati. This post is based on a WSGR alert.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Companies incorporated outside of California but with significant California contacts (so-called &#8220;quasi-California corporations&#8221;) have struggled with exactly how to comply with the long-arm statute found in Section 2115 of the California Corporations Code. The statute purports to impose a number of provisions of the California Corporations Code on quasi-California corporations, including the state&#8217;s requirement to obtain separate approval from holders of each class of capital stock on a merger &#8220;to the exclusion of the law of the jurisdiction in which [the quasi-California corporation] is incorporated.&#8221; Section 2115 has been thought to be legally infirm for some time, particularly after a decision by the Delaware Supreme Court in 2005. However, there never has been an acknowledgement by a California court that Section 2115 reaches too far. That changed earlier this year, when a California Court of Appeal stated in dicta that certain matters of internal corporate governance fall within a corporation&#8217;s internal affairs and should be governed by the laws of the corporation&#8217;s state of incorporation.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/19/california-court-acknowledges-quasi-california-corporation-decision/#more-33071" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading California Court Acknowledges &#8220;Quasi-California Corporation&#8221; Decision">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/19/california-court-acknowledges-quasi-california-corporation-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
