<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/21/the-supreme-courts-recent-focus-on-10b-5-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 15:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Supreme Court’s Recent Focus on 10b-5 Cases</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/21/the-supreme-courts-recent-focus-on-10b-5-cases/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-supreme-courts-recent-focus-on-10b-5-cases</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/21/the-supreme-courts-recent-focus-on-10b-5-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 12:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation & Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 10b-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=33123?d=20150113135815EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years from now, when historians write the history of the Roberts Court, perhaps they will be able to explain why, in the second half of the first dozen years of the 21st Century, the Supreme Court suddenly became so interested in taking up cases under the federal securities laws. Indeed, a review of recent private [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Noam Noked, co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Friday, September 21, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.weil.com/PaulFerrillo/" target="_blank">Paul A. Ferrillo</a>, litigation counsel at Weil, Gotshal &amp; Manges LLP. This post is based on a survey of securities fraud litigation by Mr. Ferrillo, <a href="http://www.weil.com/robertcarangelo/" target="_blank">Robert F. Carangelo</a>, <a href="http://www.weil.com/davidschwartz/" target="_blank">David Schwartz</a> and <a href="http://www.weil.com/matthewaltemeier/" target="_blank">Matt Altemeier</a>; the full guide, including complete footnotes, is available <a href="http://www.weil.com/files/upload/10b-5_Guide.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>Years from now, when historians write the history of the Roberts Court, perhaps they will be able to explain why, in the second half of the first dozen years of the 21st Century, the Supreme Court suddenly became so interested in taking up cases under the federal securities laws. Indeed, a review of recent <a name="1b"></a>private 10b-5 jurisprudence reveals that the last two years have generated more United States Supreme Court precedent than the previous eighteen. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/09/21/the-supreme-courts-recent-focus-on-10b-5-cases/#1">[1]</a> These cases could have profound implications for how public and private companies around the globe meet their reporting obligations, defend against class actions, and/or maintain their credibility in the eyes of regulators, judges, and investors. We discuss this plethora of recent Supreme Court cases below, concluding with a discussion of <em>Amgen, Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans &amp; Trust Funds</em>, which will be heard by the Supreme Court in November 2012.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/21/the-supreme-courts-recent-focus-on-10b-5-cases/#more-33123" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Supreme Court’s Recent Focus on 10b-5 Cases">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/09/21/the-supreme-courts-recent-focus-on-10b-5-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
