<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/02/tying-non-competes-to-sale-of-business-california-appellate-court-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 11:30:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Tying Non-Competes to Sale of Business: California Appellate Court Decision</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/02/tying-non-competes-to-sale-of-business-california-appellate-court-decision/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=tying-non-competes-to-sale-of-business-california-appellate-court-decision</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/02/tying-non-competes-to-sale-of-business-california-appellate-court-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-competition agreements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=33574?d=20150113135749EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On August 24, 2012, in the case of Fillpoint, LLC v. Maas, a California appellate court issued an opinion reinforcing both California&#8217;s general public policy against covenants not to compete and the important exceptions to that rule. While California Business and Professions Code § 16600 generally declares void any covenant that restrains an individual from [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Eduardo Gallardo, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, October 2, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/egallardo" target="_blank">Eduardo Gallardo</a> is a partner focusing on mergers and acquisitions at Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP. This post is based on a Gibson Dunn client alert by <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/jalexander" target="_blank">Jim Alexander</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/fbrown" target="_blank">Frederick Brown</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/sjjohnson" target="_blank">Steven J. Johnson</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/jschwartz" target="_blank">Jason Schwartz</a> and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/ksmith" target="_blank">Katherine V.A. Smith</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On August 24, 2012, in the case of <em>Fillpoint, LLC v. Maas</em>, a California appellate court issued an opinion reinforcing both California&#8217;s general public policy against covenants not to compete and the important exceptions to that rule. While California Business and Professions Code § 16600 generally declares void any covenant that restrains an individual from engaging in a lawful profession, trade or business, § 16601 provides an exception to this rule for covenants executed in connection with the sale of a business. The <em>Fillpoint </em>case instructs that, to qualify for § 16601&#8217;s sale-of-business exception, employers must thoroughly document and tether any non-compete covenant to the sale of a business.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/02/tying-non-competes-to-sale-of-business-california-appellate-court-decision/#more-33574" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Tying Non-Competes to Sale of Business: California Appellate Court Decision">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/02/tying-non-competes-to-sale-of-business-california-appellate-court-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
