<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/30/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-hastily-filed-caremark-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 18:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Hastily Filed Caremark Action</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/30/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-hastily-filed-caremark-action/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-hastily-filed-caremark-action</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/30/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-hastily-filed-caremark-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 13:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Boards of Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivative suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Director liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder suits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=35325?d=20150113135142EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 25, 2012, Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismissed the derivative complaint in South v. Baker, C.A. No. 7294-VCL, with prejudice. This decision reaffirms the Chancery Court&#8217;s low tolerance for hastily filed shareholder derivative lawsuits brought under the In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Eduardo Gallardo, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, October 30, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/egallardo" target="_blank">Eduardo Gallardo</a> is a partner focusing on mergers and acquisitions at Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP. This post is based on a Gibson Dunn client alert by Mr. Gallardo, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/blutz" target="_blank">Brian Lutz</a>, <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/jhallowell" target="_blank">James Hallowell</a>, and <a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/lawyers/jbell" target="_blank">Jefferson Bell</a>. This post is part of the <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">Delaware law series</a>, which is cosponsored by the Forum and Corporation Service Company; links to other posts in the series are available <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/the-delaware-law-series/">here</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On September 25, 2012, Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware dismissed the derivative complaint in <em><a href="http://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/Documents/South_v_Baker_et_al.pdf" target="_blank">South v. Baker</a></em>, C.A. No. 7294-VCL, with prejudice. This decision reaffirms the Chancery Court&#8217;s low tolerance for hastily filed shareholder derivative lawsuits brought under the <em>In re Caremark International Inc. Derivative Litigation</em>, 698 A.2d 959 (Del. Ch. 1996), line of cases where the plaintiff makes little effort to plead any connection between a &#8220;corporate trauma&#8221; and the conduct of a board of directors. At the same time, the <em>South</em> decision also finds that shareholders are entitled to, and should seek, books and records from Delaware corporations before bringing derivative lawsuits in Delaware. Accordingly, Delaware corporations should anticipate an increase in shareholder demands for books and records under Section 220 of the Delaware General Corporation Law in the wake of any &#8220;corporate trauma.&#8221; In addition, the <em>South </em>decision found that dismissal of the <em>South</em> complaint did not preclude other Hecla shareholders from filing future derivative suits because the <em>South</em> plaintiffs did not use Section 220 and, therefore, did not adequately represent Hecla&#8217;s interests.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/30/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-hastily-filed-caremark-action/#more-35325" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Delaware Court of Chancery Dismisses Hastily Filed Caremark Action">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/10/30/delaware-court-of-chancery-dismisses-hastily-filed-caremark-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
