<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/11/02/a-theory-of-empty-voting-and-hidden-ownership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 11:30:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.10</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>A Theory of Empty Voting and Hidden Ownership</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/11/02/a-theory-of-empty-voting-and-hidden-ownership/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-theory-of-empty-voting-and-hidden-ownership</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/11/02/a-theory-of-empty-voting-and-hidden-ownership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Elections & Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Control rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empty voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hidden ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shareholder voting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=35475?d=20150105105348EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In our recent paper, On Derivatives Markets and Social Welfare: A Theory of Empty Voting and Hidden Ownership, we build and explore a formal theoretical framework to understand interactions between derivatives markets and shareholder voting behavior. Ownership of stock in a corporation entails two types of rights with respect to that corporation. First, shareholders have [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by June Rhee, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, on Friday, November 2, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;">The following post comes to us from <a href="http://www.sandiego.edu/law/academics/faculty/bio.php?id=823" target="_blank">Jordan M. Barry</a>, Associate Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law, <a href="http://faculty-gsb.stanford.edu/hatfield/" target="_blank">John William Hatfield</a>, Assistant Professor of Political Economy at the Stanford Graduate School of Business; and <a href="http://bfi.uchicago.edu/people/kominers.shtml" target="_blank">Scott Duke Kominers</a>, Research Scholar at the Becker Friedman Institute for Research in Economics at the University of Chicago.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In our recent paper, <a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2134458" target="_blank">On Derivatives Markets and Social Welfare: A Theory of Empty Voting and Hidden Ownership</a>, we build and explore a formal theoretical framework to understand interactions between derivatives markets and shareholder voting behavior.</p>
<p>Ownership of stock in a corporation entails two types of rights with respect to that corporation. First, shareholders have <em>economic </em>ownership rights that entitle them to share in corporate profits. Second, they have certain legal rights of <em>control</em> over the corporation. These economic and control rights come bound together with each share of stock, but they can be separated, or <em>decoupled</em>. Decoupling can result in <em>empty voting</em>, in which an actor’s voting interest in a corporation is larger than her economic interest. It can also lead to <em>hidden ownership</em>, in which an actor’s economic interest in a corporation exceeds her voting interest. Decoupling raises a host of concerns because it turns the conventional logic for granting shareholders voting rights—their economic interest in the corporation—on its head. (See references <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/tag/empty-voting/">here</a>.)</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/11/02/a-theory-of-empty-voting-and-hidden-ownership/#more-35475" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading A Theory of Empty Voting and Hidden Ownership">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/11/02/a-theory-of-empty-voting-and-hidden-ownership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
