<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/12/09/money-market-funds-fsoc-proposes-reforms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 20:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Money Market Funds: FSOC Proposes Reforms</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/12/09/money-market-funds-fsoc-proposes-reforms/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=money-market-funds-fsoc-proposes-reforms</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/12/09/money-market-funds-fsoc-proposes-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Financial Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FSOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money market funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC rulemaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=37181?d=20150113134723EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 13, 2012, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), faced with a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that has been deadlocked over whether or how to address concerns about money market funds (MMFs), voted unanimously to propose three MMF reforms. The vote was the FSOC&#8217;s first exercise of its power under section 120 of [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Dwight C. Smith, Morrison & Foerster LLP, on Sunday, December 9, 2012 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.mofo.com/Dwight-C-Smith/" target="_blank">Dwight C. Smith</a> is a partner at Morrison &amp; Foerster LLP focusing on bank regulatory matters. This post is based on a Morrison &amp; Foerster client alert by <a href="http://www.mofo.com/Jay-G-Baris/" target="_blank">Jay Baris</a>.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>On November 13, 2012, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), faced with a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that has been deadlocked over whether or how to address concerns about money market funds (MMFs), voted unanimously to propose three MMF reforms. The vote was the FSOC&#8217;s first exercise of its <a name="1b"></a>power under section 120 of the Dodd-Frank Act to recommend heightened regulatory standards to financial regulatory agencies. If finalized, today&#8217;s proposal will result in a recommendation that the SEC act on at least one of the reforms. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/12/09/money-market-funds-fsoc-proposes-reforms/#1">[1]</a></p>
<p>Last August, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro, in a controversial decision, <em>tabled proposed rulemaking</em> on MMFs because of the lack of support from three Commissioners of the SEC. In a letter sent in late September, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner urged the FSOC members at their November meeting to take up MMF reform through their section 120 powers. According to Secretary Geithner at today’s meeting, the FSOC’s decision was taken on the recommendation of Chairman Schapiro.</p>
<p>The proposal from the FSOC presents three options for MMF reform, two of which were before the SEC in August, and requests public comment during the 60 days following publication of the proposal in the Federal Register. The FSOC does not regard the three options as mutually exclusive and thus could recommend more than one to the SEC. The three options are as follows:</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/12/09/money-market-funds-fsoc-proposes-reforms/#more-37181" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Money Market Funds: FSOC Proposes Reforms">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2012/12/09/money-market-funds-fsoc-proposes-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
