<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/01/24/checklist-for-successful-acquisitions-in-the-u-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 12:59:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Checklist for Successful Acquisitions in the U.S.</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/01/24/checklist-for-successful-acquisitions-in-the-u-s/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=checklist-for-successful-acquisitions-in-the-u-s</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/01/24/checklist-for-successful-acquisitions-in-the-u-s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Mergers & Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross-border transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign firms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=39394?d=20150113133951EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 40% of global M&#38;A in 2012 involved acquirors and targets in different countries, including $170 billion of acquisitions in the U.S. by non-U.S. acquirors. Given the continuing accumulation of U.S. Dollars in emerging economies, many expect the trend to continue as Dollars are re-invested in the U.S. Natural resources will continue to be [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Adam O. Emmerich, Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, January 24, 2013 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.wlrk.com/AOEmmerich/" target="_blank">Adam Emmerich</a> is a partner in the corporate department at Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &amp; Katz focusing primarily on mergers and acquisitions and securities law matters. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton firm memorandum by Mr. Emmerich, <a href="http://www.wlrk.com/rpanovka/" target="_blank">Robin Panovka</a>, and other partners of Wachtell Lipton.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>More than 40% of global M&amp;A in 2012 involved acquirors and targets in different countries, including $170 billion of acquisitions in the U.S. by non-U.S. acquirors. Given the continuing accumulation of U.S. Dollars in emerging economies, many expect the trend to continue as Dollars are re-invested in the U.S. Natural resources will continue to be an important part of this story, including in the U.S., where substantial non-U.S. investment has been an important trend, as well as in resource-rich developed nations such as Canada and Australia, where non-domestic investment has lately been highly controversial.</p>
<p>Despite the empty election-year protectionist rhetoric in the U.S. last year, and continuing global concern over access to resources and technology by non-domestic actors, U.S. deal markets continue to be some of the most hospitable markets to off-shore acquirors and investors. With careful advance preparation, strategically thoughtful implementation and sophisticated deal structures that anticipate likely concerns, most acquisitions in the U.S. can be successfully achieved. Cross-border deals involving investment into the U.S. are more likely to fail because of poor planning and execution rather than fundamental legal or political restrictions.</p>
<p>Following is our updated checklist of issues that should be carefully considered in advance of an acquisition or strategic investment in the United States. Because each cross-border deal is different, the relative significance of the issues discussed below will depend upon the specific facts, circumstances and dynamics of each particular situation:</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/01/24/checklist-for-successful-acquisitions-in-the-u-s/#more-39394" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading Checklist for Successful Acquisitions in the U.S.">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/01/24/checklist-for-successful-acquisitions-in-the-u-s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
