<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance</title>
	<atom:link href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/02/06/the-best-laid-plans-of-10b5-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu</link>
	<description>The leading online blog in the fields of corporate governance and financial regulation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 11:32:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.8</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Best-Laid Plans of 10b5-1</title>
		<link>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/02/06/the-best-laid-plans-of-10b5-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-best-laid-plans-of-10b5-1</link>
		<comments>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/02/06/the-best-laid-plans-of-10b5-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 14:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
<!-- 		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator> -->
				<category><![CDATA[Practitioner Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insider trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule 10b-5-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/?p=39934?d=20150113111109EST</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the world of insider trading, Rule 10b5-1 plans are a blessing and a curse: a blessing, because they enable executives to diversify their company holdings in a stable, law-abiding manner; a curse, because they tempt cheaters into hiding their malfeasance in a cloak of invisibility. For years, 10b5-1 plans received little scrutiny. In private [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<hgroup><em>Posted by Boris Feldman, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Wednesday, February 6, 2013 </em><div class='e_n' style='background:#F8F8F8;padding:10px;margin-top:5px;margin-bottom:10px;text-indent:2.5em;'><strong style='margin-left:-2.5em;'>Editor's Note: </strong> <p style="margin:0; display:inline;"><a href="http://www.borisfeldman.com" target="_blank">Boris Feldman</a> is a member of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &amp; Rosati, P.C. The views expressed in this post are those of Mr. Feldman and do not reflect those of his firm or clients.</p>
</div></hgroup><p>In the world of insider trading, Rule 10b5-1 plans are a blessing and a curse: a blessing, because they enable executives to diversify their company holdings in a stable, law-abiding manner; a curse, because they tempt cheaters into hiding their malfeasance in a cloak of invisibility.</p>
<p>For years, 10b5-1 plans received little scrutiny. In private shareholder lawsuits, plaintiffs’ lawyers generally scrunched their eyes shut and tried to ignore them. The SEC, having created the structure, lost interest postpartum. As a result, aggressive insiders sometimes were able to use the plans in ways the framers never intended.</p>
<p><a name="1b"></a>Recently, journalists have started to focus on the specifics of 10b5-1 plans, along with perceived abuses of them. <a href="http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2013/02/06/the-best-laid-plans-of-10b5-1/#1">[1]</a> Those articles appear to have roused the SEC. So this may be a good time for counsel, both inside and outside, to revisit their existing plans. In this post, I address what I consider to be best practices under 10b5-1. This does not mean that contrary practices are improper or unlawful. Think of it, rather, as 10b5-1 for the risk averse.</p>
<p> <a href="https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/02/06/the-best-laid-plans-of-10b5-1/#more-39934" class="more-link"><span aria-label="Continue reading The Best-Laid Plans of 10b5-1">(more&hellip;)</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2013/02/06/the-best-laid-plans-of-10b5-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
